...
首页> 外文期刊>Digital investigation >Cognitive and human factors in digital forensics: Problems, challenges, and the way forward
【24h】

Cognitive and human factors in digital forensics: Problems, challenges, and the way forward

机译:数字取证中的认知和人为因素:问题,挑战,前进的方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Digital forensics is an important and growing forensic domain. Research on miscarriages of justice and misleading evidence, as well as various inquires in the UK and the US, have highlighted human error as an issue within forensic science. This has led to increased attention to the sources of cognitive bias and potential countermeasures within many forensic disciplines. However, the area of digital forensics has yet to pay sufficient attention to this issue. The main goal of this article is to contribute to a more scientifically sound digital forensics domain by addressing the issues of cognitive bias as a source of error. In this paper we present an analysis of seven sources of cognitive and human error specifically within the digital forensics process, and discuss relevant countermeasures. We conclude that although some cognitive and bias issues are very similar across forensic domains, others are different and dependent on the specific characteristic of the domain in question, such as digital forensics. There is a need for new directions in research with regard to cognitive and human factors in digital forensics. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:数字取证是一个重要且不断增长的法医结构域。关于司法和误导性证据的流产以及英国和美国的各种询问研究,突出了人为错误作为法医学中的问题。这导致了对许多法医学科的认知偏差源和潜在对策的影响。然而,数字取证领域尚未对此问题进行足够的重视。本文的主要目标是通过将认知偏见问题作为错误来源来解决更为科学的数字取证域。在本文中,我们在数字取证过程中展示了七个认知和人类错误的分析,并讨论了相关的对策。我们得出结论,虽然在法医域中的一些认知和偏见问题非常相似,但其他人不同,依赖于所涉及域的具体特征,例如数字取证。在数字取证中的认知和人类因素方面需要新的进展。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号