首页> 外文期刊>Dialectical Anthropology >Shifting Boundaries of “Nativity” and “Modernity” in South Asian Women’s Clothes
【24h】

Shifting Boundaries of “Nativity” and “Modernity” in South Asian Women’s Clothes

机译:南亚女性服饰中“本土化”和“现代性”的转移边界

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the last two decades the postmodernist (POMO) scholars have popularized the concepts of subjectivity, authenticity, modernity, and nativity in academia while rejecting the role of larger structural, institutional and historical forces (referred as meta-narrative) in understanding social and cultural issues. This essay challenges POMO scholar’s approach by focusing on the case of South Asian women’s personal experiences and choices (subjectivity) historically with their every day clothes (everyday culture), both nationally and trans-nationally. This essay highlights the role of various local, historical, social, economic, political, colonial, and international forces that contributed in creating particular dress code and style (social reproduction of customs) for women of different social groups in South Asia in different historical times. With this approach it was possible to eliminate the binary concepts of nativity/modernity, progressive/primitive, developed/undeveloped etc., and treat all societies in the world with the same yardstick, while at the same time acknowledging the unequal relationship between the colonizers and colonized. This essay is also an attempt to suggest how everyday cultural issues can be historically explained in an inclusive manner without sacrificing the role of human agency, (human creativity, human capabilities, actions, and subjectivity), the role of imagination (creativity), the role of structural and institutional forces (meta-narrative), and the role of cultural forces (religion, nationalism, customs, and others), and cultural experiences in everyday life. At the same time everyday cultural issues are contextualized historically (time and space—locally and globally), politically, culturally, and economically as well.
机译:在过去的二十年中,后现代主义(POMO)学者在学术界普及了主观性,真实性,现代性和诞生性的概念,同时拒绝了更大的结构,制度和历史力量(称为元叙事)在理解社会和文化中的作用问题。本文着眼于历史上南亚女性在国内和跨国的日常服装(日常文化)中的个人经历和选择(主观性)的情况,从而对POMO学者的方法提出了挑战。本文重点介绍了各种地方,历史,社会,经济,政治,殖民和国际力量的作用,这些力量在不同的历史时期为南亚不同社会群体的妇女创造了特定的着装和风格(习俗的社会再现) 。通过这种方法,有可能消除诞生/现代,进步/原始,发达/不发达等二元概念,并以相同的标准对待世界上所有社会,同时承认殖民者之间的不平等关系。并殖民。本文还试图提出一种历史性的日常文化问题,如何在不牺牲人类代理的作用(人类创造力,人类能力,行为和主观性),想象力(创造力),结构和制度力量的作用(元叙事),文化力量的作用(宗教,民族主义,习俗等),以及日常生活中的文化经验。同时,每天的文化问题都在历史上(时间和空间-本地和全球),政治,文化和经济方面进行了背景分析。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dialectical Anthropology》 |2005年第1期|00000085-00000121|共37页
  • 作者

    Vinay Bahl;

  • 作者单位

    Integrated Studies, Pennsylvania College of Technology, Williamsport, PA, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:36:49

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号