首页> 外文期刊>JMIR formative research. >Feasibility and Acceptability of a Smoking Cessation Smartphone App (My QuitBuddy) in Older Persons: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Smoking Cessation Smartphone App (My QuitBuddy) in Older Persons: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:吸烟智能手机应用程序(我的QuitBuddy)在老年人中的可行性和可接受性:试点随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Although many smoking cessation smartphone apps exist, few have been independently evaluated, particularly in older populations. In 2017, of the 112 commercially available smoking cessation apps in Australia, only 6 were deemed to be of high quality, in that they partially adhered to Australian guidelines. Mobile health (mHealth) apps have the potential to modify smoking behavior at a relatively low cost; however, their acceptability in older smokers remains unknown. Rigorous scientific evaluation of apps is thus urgently needed to assist smokers and clinicians alike.OBJECTIVE:We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility of a large-scale trial to assess the use and acceptability of a high-quality smoking cessation app in older smokers.METHODS:Adult inpatient and outpatient smokers with computer and smartphone access were recruited face to face and via telephone interviews from Metropolitan Hospitals in Brisbane, Australia. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the intervention (requested to download the "My QuitBuddy" smoking cessation app on their smartphone) or the control group (provided access to a tailored smoking cessation support webpage [Quit HQ]). The My QuitBuddy app is freely available from app stores and provides personalized evidenced-based smoking cessation support. Quit HQ offers regular email support over 12 weeks. No training or instructions on the use of these e-resources were given to participants. Outcomes at 3 months included recruitment and retention rates, use and acceptability of e-resource (User Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale [uMARS]), changes in quitting motivation (10-point scale), and self-reported smoking abstinence.RESULTS:We randomized 64 of 231 potentially eligible individuals (27.7%). The mean age of participants was 62 (SD 8). Nicotine dependence was moderate (mean Heaviness of Smoking Index [HSI] 2.8 [SD 1.2]). At 3 months the retention rate was (58/64, 91%). A total of 15 of 31 participants in the intervention arm (48%) used the app at least once, compared with 10 of 33 (30%) in the control arm. uMARS scores for e-resource use and acceptability were statistically similar (P=.29). Motivation to quit was significantly higher in the intervention arm compared with the control arm (median 6 [IQR 4-8] versus 4 [IQR 4-5], respectively, P=.02). According to the intention-to-treat analysis, smoking abstinence was nonsignificantly higher in the intervention group (4/31 [13%], 95% CI 4%-30%, versus 2/33 [6%], 95% CI 1%-20%; P=.42). The estimated number needed to treat was 14.CONCLUSIONS:Internet and mHealth smoking cessation resources appear acceptable to a minority of older smokers. Smokers who engaged with the allocated e-resources rated them equally, and there were trends toward greater uptake, increased motivation, and higher abstinence rates in the app group; however, only the change in motivation reached statistical significance (median score 6 versus 4, respectively, P=.02). This results of this pilot study suggest that apps may improve quit outcomes in older adults who are willing to use them. Further research into user-app interactions should be undertaken to facilitate improvements in app design and consumer engagement. These favorable trends should be explored in larger trials with sufficient statistical power.TRIAL REGISTRATION:Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000159156; http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=376849&isReview=true.?Jenny Peek, Karen Hay, Pauline Hughes, Adrienne Kostellar, Subodh Kumar, Zaheerodin Bhikoo, John Serginson, Henry M Marshall. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 14.04.2021.
机译:背景:虽然存在许多吸烟智能手机应用程序,但很少有人被独立评估,特别是在较老的人口中。 2017年,在澳大利亚的112个商用吸烟应用程序中,只有6个被认为是高质量的,因为他们部分遵守澳大利亚指南。移动健康(MHECHEATH)应用程序有可能以相对较低的成本修改吸烟行为;然而,他们在老年吸烟者中的可接受性仍然未知。因此,迫切需要对应用程序进行严谨的科学评估,以帮助吸烟者和临床医生。目的:我们进行了一项试点随机对照试验,以评估大规模试验的可行性,以评估高质量的吸烟停止应用程序的使用和可接受性较旧的吸烟者。参与者随机分配1:1到干预(请求下载我的智能手机上的“我的QuitBuddy”吸烟应用程序)或对照组(提供对量身定制的吸烟停止支持网页[退出HQ])。我的Quitbuddy应用程序从App StoreS自由获得,并提供个性化的基于禁止的吸烟戒烟支持。退出HQ超过12周提供常规电子邮件支持。没有关于使用这些电子资源的培训或指示。 3个月的结果包括招聘和保留率,电子资源的使用和可接受性(用户版的移动应用程序评级规模[umars]),戒烟动机(10分)的变化,以及自我报告的吸烟禁欲。结果:我们随机化231个可能符合条件的个人(27.7%)。参与者的平均年龄是62(SD 8)。尼古丁依赖是中度(吸烟指数的平均沉重[HSI] 2.8 [SD 1.2])。 3个月,保留率为(58/64,91%)。干预臂中共有15个参与者中的15个参与者(48%)至少使用过一次应用,而控制臂中的10个(30%)相比。 E-Resource使用和可接受性的Umars分数在统计上类似(P = .29)。与控制臂(中位6 [IQR 4-8]与4 [IQR 4-5]相比,P = .02)相比,干预臂的动机在干预臂中显着高。根据意向治疗分析,干预组的吸烟戒烟较高(4/31 [13%],95%CI 4%-30%,与2/33 [6%],95%CI 1 %-20%; p = .42)。治疗所需的估计数是14.结论:互联网和MHEALTE吸烟资源似乎是少数面积的吸烟者可以接受。从事分配的电子资源的吸烟者平均评定了它们,并且在App Group中有更大的摄取,增加的动机和更高的禁欲率趋势;然而,只有动机的变化达到统计显着性(分别是2分,P = .02)。该试点研究的结果表明,应用程序可能会改善愿意使用它们的老年人的退出结果。应进行进一步研究用户应用程序的交互,以促进应用程序设计和消费者参与的改进。这些有利的趋势应该在具有足够的统计学职业的较大试验中探讨。注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验登记处ACTRN126190001591566; http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial/registration/trialreview.aspx?id=376849&isreview=376849&isreview=376849& review=376849&isreview=true.?jenny peek,karen干草,pauline hughes,adrienne kostellar,subodh Kumar,Zheerdin Bhikoo,John Serginson,Henry M马歇尔。最初发表在JMIR形成研究(http://formative.jmir.org),14.04.2021。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号