首页> 外文期刊>JMIR Dermatology >From the Cochrane Library: Topical Tacrolimus for Atopic Dermatitis
【24h】

From the Cochrane Library: Topical Tacrolimus for Atopic Dermatitis

机译:来自Cochrane图书馆:针对特应性皮炎的局部标准羊毛血症

获取原文
           

摘要

Among chronic skin disorders, atopic dermatitis (AD) demonstrates the greatest negative impact on quality of life for both affected patients and their families, and is associated with anxiety, guilt, and depression [1]. Emotional stress from uncontrolled eczema can be displaced on coworkers, students, and teachers, affecting the entire community. Thus, effective eczema management potentially has farreaching benefits. Eczema is commonly treated with topical corticosteroids (TCS), the long-term use of which may cause dermal atrophy, striae, and hypertrichosis, among other adverse effects [2]. Additionally, patients may suffer from treatment-resistant eczema. Therefore, cost-effective alternative treatments with fewer side-effects may be prudent. A 2015 Cochrane review, “Topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis”, assesses the efficacy and safety of the topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) tacrolimus and pimecrolimus in comparison to conventional treatments (20 randomized controlled trials, n=5,885) [2]. Significant drug comparison findings are summarized in Table 1. This review found convincing evidence that tacrolimus 0.1% was significantly more effective than low-potency TCS, pimecrolimus 1%, and tacrolimus 0.03% at improving physician- and patient-assessed appearance of eczemaaffected skin in many settings. While results were mainly obtained using the subjective measures mentioned previously, several trials included in the review indicated that tacrolimus significantly improved objective measures such as eczema area and severity index (EASI), quality of life (QoL), and scoring atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) when compared to certain TCS in various settings. However, lack of data on these secondary outcomes limited the completeness of evidence. Unfortunately, since the publication of this Cochrane review only one randomized control trial (RCT) analyzing the efficacy of TCI’s has been published [3]. Despite this RCT validating the findings of this Cochrane review, further research is warranted to investigate the true relationship between TCS and TCI’s utilizing objective standardized criteria.
机译:在慢性皮肤病中,特应性皮炎(AD)表现出对受影响患者及其家庭的生活质量的最大负面影响,并且与焦虑,内疚和抑郁有关[1]。来自不受控制的湿疹的情绪压力可以在同事,学生和教师上流离失所,影响整个社区。因此,有效的湿疹管理可能有骚乱的利益。湿疹通常用局部皮质类固醇(TCS)治疗,长期使用可能导致皮肤萎缩,受体和高温,以及其他不利影响[2]。此外,患者可能患有抗治疗的湿疹。因此,具有较少副作用的经济有效的替代治疗可能是谨慎的。 2015年Cochrane评论“特应性皮炎的局部标准虫毛细血管”,评估局部钙突蛋白抑制剂(TCI)Tacrolimus和Pimecrolimus的疗效和安全性与常规治疗相比(20种随机对照试验,N = 5,885)[2]。表1中概述了显着的药物比较结果。该综述发现令人信服的证据表明,在改善医师和患者评估的湿疹皮肤外观时,他克莫姆斯0.1%比低效力TCS,Pimecrolimus 1%和Tacrolimus 0.03%更有效许多设置。虽然结果主要是使用先前提到的主观措施获得的,但审查中包含的几项试验表明,他克莫司明显改善了湿疹地区和严重程度指数(EASI),生命质量(QOL)等客观措施,以及分别的皮肤病(Scorad)与各种设置中的某些TC相比。但是,这些二次结果的数据缺乏数据限制了证据的完整性。不幸的是,由于该Cochrane的出版物仅审查了一个随机控制试验(RCT)分析了TCI已发表的疗效[3]。尽管该RCT验证了该Cochrane审查的调查结果,但有必要进一步研究,以调查TCS与TCI之间的真实关系,利用客观标准化标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号