首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in drug safety. >The safety, tolerability and mortality reduction efficacy of remdesivir; based on randomized clinical trials, observational and case studies reported safety outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

The safety, tolerability and mortality reduction efficacy of remdesivir; based on randomized clinical trials, observational and case studies reported safety outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:Remdesivir的安全性,耐受性和死亡率降低; 基于随机临床试验,观测和案例研究报告了安全结果:更新的系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Remdesivir, an experimental antiviral drug has shown to inhibit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), both in vitro and in vivo. The present systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to quantify the safety and tolerability of remdesivir, based on safety outcome findings from randomized controlled trials, observational studies and case reports of remdesivir in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Methods: We have performed a systematic search in the PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library using specific keywords such as ‘COVID-19’ OR ‘SARS CoV-2’ AND ‘Remdesivir’. The study endpoints include total adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), grade 3 and grade 4 AEs, mortality and drug tolerability. Statistical analysis was carried out by using Revman 5.4 software. Results: Total 15 studies were included for systematic review, but only 5 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) ( n = 13,622) were included for meta-analysis. Visual inspection of the forest plots for remdesivir 10-day versus placebo and remdesivir 10-day versus 5-day groups revealed that there is a significant difference in SAEs [10-day remdesivir versus control (odds ratio [OR] = 0.55, 0.40–0.74) p = 0.0001; I 2 = 0%; 10-day remdesivir versus 5-day remdesivir (OR = 0.56, 0.38–0.84) p = 0.005; I 2 = 13%]. In grade 4 AEs, there is a significant difference in 10-day remdesivir versus control (OR = 0.32, 0.19–0.54) p = 0.0001; I 2 = 0%, but not in comparison to 5-day remdesivir (OR = 0.95, 0.59–1.54) p = 0.85; I 2 = 0%. But there is no significant difference in grade 3 AEs [remdesivir 10 day versus control (OR = 0.81, 0.59–1.11) p = 0.19; I 2 = 0%; 10-day remdesivir versus 5-day remdesivir (OR = 1.24, 0.86–1.80) p = 0.25; I 2 = 0%], in total AEs [remdesivir 10 day versus control (OR = 1.07, 0.66–1.75) p = 0.77; I 2 = 79%; remdesivir 10 day versus 5 day (OR = 1.08, 0.70–1.68) p = 0.73; I 2 = 54%)], in mortality [10-day remdesivir versus control (OR = 0.93, 0.80–1.08) p = 0.32; I 2 = 0%; 10-day remdesivir versus 5-day remdesivir (OR = 1.39, 0.73–2.62) p = 0.32; I 2 = 0%)] and tolerability [remdesivir 10 day versus control (OR = 1.05, 0.51–2.18) p = 0.89; I 2 = 65%, 10-day remdesivir versus 5-day remdesivir (OR = 0.86, 0.18–4.01) p = 0.85; I 2 = 78%]. Discussion & Conclusion: Ten-day remdesivir was a safe antiviral agent but not tolerable over control in the hospitalized COVID-19 patients with a need of administration cautiousness for grade 3 AEs. There was no added benefit of 10- or 5-day remdesivir in reducing mortality over placebo. To avoid SAEs, we suggest for prior monitoring of liver function tests (LFT), renal function tests (RFT), complete blood count (CBC) and serum electrolytes for those with preexisting hepatic and renal impairments and patients receiving concomitant hepatotoxic or nephrotoxic drugs. Furthermore, a number of RCTs of remdesivir in COVID-19 patients are suggested. Plain Language Summary Ten-day remdesivir is a safe antiviral drug with common adverse events in comparison to placebo. The rate of serious adverse events and grade 3 adverse events were significantly lower in 10-day remdesivir in comparison to placebo/5-day remdesivir. There was no significant difference in the rate of tolerability and mortality reduction in 10-day remdesivir over placebo/5-day remdesivir. There were no new safety signals reported in vulnerable populations, paediatric, pregnant and lactating women.
机译:简介:雷德肽,一种实验抗病毒药物表明,在体外和体内抑制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-COV-2)。进行本发明的系统回顾和荟萃分析,以量化雷德氏菌的安全结果结果,从冠状病毒疾病2019(Covid-19)患者中的随机对照试验,观察研究和案例报告的安全结果结果来量化Remdesivir的安全性和耐受性。方法:我们使用特定关键字如“Covid-19”或“SARS COV-2”和“REMDESIVIR”,在PUBMED,Google Scholar和Cochrane库中进行了系统搜索。研究终点包括总不良事件(AES),严重不良事件(SAES),3级和4级AES,死亡率和药物耐受性。通过使用Revman 5.4软件进行统计分析。结果:总共包括15项研究,用于系统审查,但仅包括5项随机临床试验(RCT)(RCTS)(N = 13,622)进行荟萃分析。对雷德赛雷达尔的森林情节的目视检查10天与安慰剂和雷德痢有10天与5天的群体揭示了SAES存在显着差异[10天雷德维尔与控制(赔率比[或] = 0.55,0.40- 0.74)P = 0.0001;我2 = 0%; 10天Remdesivir与5天Remdesivir(或= 0.56,0.38-0.84)p = 0.005;我2 = 13%]。在4级AES中,10天的雷德赖维尔与控制有显着差异(或= 0.32,0.19-0.54)P = 0.0001; I 2 = 0%,但与5天的雷代韦尔(或= 0.95,0.59-1.54)p = 0.85;我2 = 0%。但3 AES级别没有显着差异[Remdesivir 10天与控制(或= 0.81,0.59-1.11)p = 0.19;我2 = 0%; 10天Remdesivir与5天Remdesivir(或= 1.24,0.86-1.80)p = 0.25; I 2 = 0%],总AES [REMDESIVIR 10天与控制(或= 1.07,0.66-1.75)p = 0.77;我2 = 79%; Remdesivir 10天与5天(或= 1.08,0.70-1.68)p = 0.73; I 2 = 54%)],在死亡率[10天雷德奈韦与控制(或= 0.93,0.80-1.08)p = 0.32;我2 = 0%; 10天Remdesivir与5天Remdesivir(或= 1.39,0.73-2.62)p = 0.32; I 2 = 0%)]和可耐受性[Remdesivir 10天与控制(或= 1.05,0.51-2.18)p = 0.89; I 2 = 65%,10天Remdesivir对5天雷代韦尔(或= 0.86,0.18-4.01)p = 0.85;我2 = 78%]。讨论和结论:十天的雷德奈尔是一种安全的抗病毒剂,但在住院的Covid-19患者中不可忍受,需要为3级持久性提供持谨慎性的患者。在减少安慰剂的死亡率下,10-或5天的雷德赖尔没有增加的益处。为了避免Saes,我们建议在肝功能试验(LFT),肾功能试验(RFT),完全血液计数(CBC)和血清电解质的先前监测,用于预先存在的肝癌和肾脏损伤以及接受伴随肝毒性或肾毒性药物的患者。此外,提出了Covid-19患者中许多RCTES的REMDESIVIR。普通语言概述十天的雷德尔韦尔是一种安全的抗病毒药物,与安慰剂相比,具有常见不良事件。与安慰剂/ 5天雷德德尔的雷德德尔病毒,10天的雷德德尔严重不良事件和3级不良事件的速度显着降低。 10天雷迪斯韦尔过度安慰剂/ 5天雷达尔的贫民率没有显着差异。弱势群体,儿科,怀孕和哺乳期妇女没有报告的新安全信号。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号