首页> 外文期刊>Library Leadership & Management >Library Security: Perceptions of Preparedness
【24h】

Library Security: Perceptions of Preparedness

机译:图书馆安全:准备的看法

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article details the results of two parallel surveys sent to the heads of campus security and the libraries at 54 schools within the SUNY system. We undertook this study to determine the extent of collaboration between these groups and to learn where library and security staff perceptions of safety and preparedness differ. The findings indicated that most campuses have emergency response plans in place for the possibility of a high-impact violent event or a human-caused emergency. However, libraries are less likely to have dedicated emergency plans and report an inconsistent mix of physical security measures and staff safety trainings. Overall, both campus security respondents and library staff members feel safe at work and reasonably prepared for a human-caused emergency. Additionally, campus security consistently rated the libraries as safer and more prepared than the librarians rated themselves, and a gap exists in perceptions of the frequency and usefulness of collaborations between the two. Security consistently answered that they are closely involved with library trainings and safety measures, while the librarians’ responses ranged from no contact with security to praise for existing collaborations and a desire for more.
机译:本文详细介绍了两次并行调查的结果,送到校园安全部门和Suny系统中的54所学校的图书馆。我们进行了本研究,以确定这些群体之间的合作程度,并学习图书馆和安全员工对安全和准备的看法不同。调查结果表明,大多数校区都有紧急响应计划,以实现高影响暴力事件或人为造成的紧急情况。但是,图书馆不太可能拥有专用的紧急计划,并报告物理安全措施和员工安全培训的不一致组合。总体而言,校园安全受访者和图书馆工作人员都在工作中感到安全,合理地为人类造成的紧急情况做好准备。此外,校园安全始终如一地评定了图书馆的更安全,而不是图书馆员自身的准备,并且在两者之间合作的频率和有用性的看法存在差距。安全始终如一地回答,他们与图书馆培训和安全措施密切相关,而图书馆员的回答无与伦比的安全性,以赞美现有的合作和更多的愿望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号