首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Pharmacology >Methylxanthine Treatment in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in China: A Real-World Study Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
【24h】

Methylxanthine Treatment in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in China: A Real-World Study Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis

机译:中国慢性阻塞性肺病急性加剧患者的甲基黄嘌呤治疗:使用倾向得分匹配分析的真实研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Although medical guidelines discourage the use of methylxanthines in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), they are still widely used in clinical practice. This study investigated the real-world use of methylxanthines in the management of AECOPD. Methods: Patient data from the Acute exacerbation of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Using REgistry data (ACURE, NCT02657525) study database were screened. Enrolled patients were divided into treatment and control groups. Propensity score (PS) matching and Cox regression analyses were used to minimize confounding factors and determine the association between methylxanthine treatment and the length of stay (LOS). Results: Among the 2088 eligible patients, 1,563 (74.9%) were in the methylxanthine treatment group. Patients treated with methylxanthines had more severe respiratory symptoms and worse lung function than those in the control group. Doxophylline was the most commonly used methylxanthine in both secondary and tertiary hospitals. After PS matching, 966 patients were equally divided into two groups. The LOS of patients in the two groups was similar [median: 8?days, interquartile range (IQR): 7–11?days, p = 0.730]. Patients in the treatment group (median: 8, IQR: 4–12) had a more significant decrease in the COPD Assessment Test score from admission to discharge than those in the control group (median: 6, IQR: 2–10, p & 0.001). Among all matched patients, the LOS was not significantly associated with methylxanthine treatment [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.02, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.89–1.16]. However, in the subgroup analysis, methylxanthines were significantly associated with a short LOS in patients with blood eosinophil count &4% (adjusted HR: 1.56, 95% CIs: 1.12–2.17). Conclusion: This study revealed that methylxanthines, especially doxophylline, are widely used in China. Methylxanthines were effective in improving symptoms in AECOPD patients. Higher blood eosinophil count may be associated with a better efficacy of methylxanthine treatment.
机译:背景:虽然医学指南令慢性阻塞性肺病(AECOPD)急性加剧患者使用甲基黄嘌呤的使用,但它们仍广泛用于临床实践。本研究调查了在AECOPD管理中的真实世界使用甲基。方法:筛选来自慢性阻塞性肺病的急性加剧的患者数据(ACURE,NCT02657525)研究数据库进行了筛选。注册的患者分为治疗和对照组。倾向评分(PS)匹配和Cox回归分析用于最大限度地减少混淆因子并确定甲基黄嘌呤治疗和逗留时间(LOS)之间的关联。结果:在2088名符合条件的患者中,1,563名(74.9%)在甲基黄嘌呤治疗组中。用甲基原石治疗的患者具有更严重的呼吸症状和比对照组中的肺功能越差。 Doxophylline是二级和三级医院中最常用的甲基黄嘌呤。 PS匹配后,966名患者同等分为两组。两组患者的洛杉矶患者是相似的[中位数:8吗?天,四分位数范围(IQR):7-11?天,P = 0.730]。治疗组中的患者(中位数:8,IQR:4-12)对征收的COPD评估试验评分比对照组的入场(中位数:6,IQR:2-10,P&amp ; LT; 0.001)。在所有匹配的患者中,LOS没有显着与甲基吡啶处理相关[调整后危险比(HR):1.02,95%置信区间(CIS):0.89-1.16]。然而,在亚组分析中,甲基黄嘌呤与血液梭核粒细胞计数患者的短暂的洛杉矶显着相关; GT; 4%(调整的HR:1.56,95%CIS:1.12-2.17)。结论:本研究表明,甲基黄嘌呤,尤其是Doxophylline在中国广泛应用。甲基黄嘌呤在改善艾双党患者的症状方面是有效的。较高的血液粒细胞计数可能与甲基黄嘌呤治疗的更好疗效相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号