首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Statistics and Probability >On the Connections Between Bridge Distributions, Marginalized Multilevel Models, and Generalized Linear Mixed Models
【24h】

On the Connections Between Bridge Distributions, Marginalized Multilevel Models, and Generalized Linear Mixed Models

机译:关于桥梁分布,边缘化多级模型和广义线性混合模型的连接

获取原文
       

摘要

Generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) are commonly used to analyze hierarchical data. Unlike linear mixed models, they do not automatically provide parametric marginal regression functions, while such functions are needed for population-averaged inferences.? This issue has received considerable attention and here three approaches to address it are reviewed, expanded, and compared: (1) the closed-form expressions of the marginal moments and distributions for a variety of GLMMs, derived by Molenberghs et al. (2010), as well as an extension that accommodates overdispersion; (2) the marginalized multilevel models? of Heagerty (1999); (3) the bridge distribution of Wang and Louis (2003), a form for the random-effects distribution that allows the conditional and hierarchical mean to be described by the same link function. Our derivations are for the identity link function, the log link, and a collection of links for binary data. We highlight a number of useful connections: (a) it is shown that the bridge distribution for data with a mean on the unit interval is unique; (b) the three approaches are different for unit-interval data with the logit link, but are connected for the probit link; for the latter, there exist closed forms; (c) further results are derived for the bridge distribution in the case of unit-interval data and a Student's $t$ link; (d) in contrast to the unit-interval case, it is shown how large classes of distributions act as bridge distributions when an identity or a logarithmic link is adopted; (e) for these links, the three approaches are either identical or closely connected; (f) it is underscored for a random-intercepts model and logarithmic link, that the data contain no information about the particular distribution for the random intercept, given that the same fit to the data can be ascribed to an entire class of random-intercept distribution; (g) the implications of the difference between the unit-interval case on the one hand and the identity and logarithmic cases on the other, regarding sensitivity to model assumptions, are discussed.
机译:广义线性混合模型(GLMM)通常用于分析分层数据。与线性混合模型不同,它们不会自动提供参数边缘回归功能,而种群平均推论需要此类功能。该问题已获得相当大的关注,并在此处审查,扩展和比较了以下三种方法:(1)由Molenberghs等人源的边际时刻和分布的闭合形式表达式。 (2010),以及适应过度分歧的延伸; (2)边缘化的多级模型? heogerty(1999); (3)Wang和Louis(2003)的桥接分布,一种用于随机效应分布的形式,其允许通过相同的链路函数来描述条件和分层的形式。我们的派生是针对身份链接函数,日志链接和二进制数据的链接集合。我们突出了许多有用的连接:(a)显示,单位间隔具有平均值的数据的桥接分布是唯一的; (b)具有Logit链路的单位间隔数据的三种方法是不同的,但是已连接概率链路;对于后者,存在封闭的形式; (c)在单位间隔数据和学生的$ T $链接的情况下,推动了进一步的结果,用于桥接分布; (d)与单位间隔情况相比,示出了在采用身份或对数链路时,大类发行量如何充当桥接分布; (e)对于这些链接,三种方法是相同或密切的; (f)由于随机拦截模型和对数链路,不包含关于随机拦截的特定分布的信息,因为与数据相同的随机拦截,则数据不包含关于随机拦截的特定分布的信息。分配; (g)讨论了单方间隔案之间的差异与另一方面的差异和对​​数案件的影响,关于模型假设的敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号