首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Statistics and Probability >Evaluating Variables as Unbiased Proxies for Other Measures: Assessing the Step Test Exercise Prescription as a Proxy for the Maximal, High-Intensity Peak Oxygen Consumption in Older Adults
【24h】

Evaluating Variables as Unbiased Proxies for Other Measures: Assessing the Step Test Exercise Prescription as a Proxy for the Maximal, High-Intensity Peak Oxygen Consumption in Older Adults

机译:评估变量作为其他措施的无偏见代理:评估较大成年人最大,高强度峰值氧气消耗的步骤测试锻炼处方作为代理

获取原文
       

摘要

To assess validity of a low-intensity measure of fitness ($X$) in a population of older adults as a proxy measure for the original, high-intensity measure ($Y$), we used ordinary least square regression with the new, potential proxy measure ($X$) as the sole explanatory variable for $Y$.? A perfect proxy measure would be unbiased (i.e., result in a regression line with a $y$-intercept of zero and a slope of one) with no error (variance equal to zero).? We evaluated the properties of potential biases of proxy measures.? A two degree-of-freedom approach using a contrast matrix in the setting of simple linear ordinary least squares regression was compared to a one degree-of-freedom paired $t$ test alternative approach.? We found that substantial improvements in power could be gained through use of the two degree-of-freedom approach in many settings, while scenarios where no linear bias was present there could be modest gains from the paired $t$ test approach.? In general, the advantages of the two degree-of-freedom approach outweighed the benefits of the one degree-of-freedom approach.? Using the two degree-of-freedom approach, we assessed the data from our motivating example and found that the low-intensity fitness measure was biased, and thus was not a good proxy for the original, high-intensity measure of fitness in older adults.
机译:为了评估旧成年人人口中适合度($ x $)的有效性作为原始的原始,高强度测量($ y $)的代理措施,我们将普通的最小二乘回归与新的,潜在的代理度量($ x $)是$ y $的唯一解释性变量。完美的代理度量将是不偏见的(即,导致带有$ Y $ -Intercept的回归线和零和一个斜率),没有错误(方差等于零)。?我们评估了代理措施潜在偏见的性质。使用对比度矩阵在简单线性普通最小二乘比赛中使用对比度矩阵的自由度方法与一种自由度配对的$ T $测试替代方法进行比较。我们发现,通过在许多设置中使用自由度的自由度方法,可以获得功率的大量改进,而存在线性偏置的场景可能与配对$ t $测试方法有谦虚的收益。一般而言,两种自由度方法的优点超过了一种自由度的益处。使用两种自由度方法,我们从激励例子中评估了数据,发现低强度健身措施偏置,因此老年成年人的原始高强度测量的原始高度衡量标准不是良好的代理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号