首页> 外文期刊>Trials >The impact of frailty Screening of Older adults with muLtidisciplinary assessment of those At Risk during emergency hospital attendance on the quality, safety and cost-effectiveness of care (SOLAR): a randomised controlled trial.
【24h】

The impact of frailty Screening of Older adults with muLtidisciplinary assessment of those At Risk during emergency hospital attendance on the quality, safety and cost-effectiveness of care (SOLAR): a randomised controlled trial.

机译:老年人筛选年龄筛选对应急住院危险危险的多学科评估的影响 - 护理质量,安全性和成本效益(太阳能):随机对照试验。

获取原文
       

摘要

Older people account for 25% of all Emergency Department (ED) admissions. This is expected to rise with an ageing demographic. Older people often present to the ED with complex medical needs in the setting of multiple comorbidities. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) has been shown to improve outcomes in an inpatient setting but clear evidence of benefit in the ED setting has not been established. It is not feasible to offer this resource-intensive assessment to all older adults in a timely fashion. Screening tools for frailty have been used to identify those at most risk for adverse outcomes following ED visit. The overall aim of this study is to examine the impact of CGA on the quality, safety and cost-effectiveness of care in an undifferentiated population of frail older people with medical complaints who present to the ED and Acute Medical Assessment Unit. This will be a parallel 1:1 allocation randomised control trial. All patients who are ≥ 75?years will be screened for frailty using the Identification of Seniors At Risk (ISAR) tool. Those with a score of ≥ 2 on the ISAR will be randomised. The treatment arm will undergo geriatric medicine team-led CGA in the ED or Acute Medical Assessment Unit whereas the non-treatment arm will undergo usual patient care. A dedicated multidisciplinary team of a specialist geriatric medicine doctor, senior physiotherapist, specialist nurse, pharmacist, senior occupational therapist and senior medical social worker will carry out the assessment, as well as interventions that arise from that assessment. Primary outcomes will be the length of stay in the ED or Acute Medical Assessment Unit. Secondary outcomes will include ED re-attendance, re-hospitalisation, functional decline, quality of life and mortality at 30?days and 180?days. These will be determined by telephone consultation and electronic records by a research nurse blinded to group allocation. Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Service Executive (HSE) Mid-Western Regional Hospital Research Ethics Committee (088/2020). Our lay dissemination strategy will be developed in collaboration with our Patient and Public Involvement stakeholder panel of older people at the Ageing Research Centre and we will present our findings in peer-reviewed journals and national and international conferences.
机译:老年人占所有急诊部门(ED)招生的25%。这有望随着老龄化的人口统计而上升。在多种合并症的设置中,老年人经常出现在复杂的医疗需求中。已显示综合的老年大疗法评估(CGA)在住院环境中提高结果,但明确的ED环境中的福利证据尚未建立。将这种资源密集型评估及时,为所有年龄较大的成年人提供对所有老年人来说是不可行的。用于脆弱的筛选工具已被用来识别在ed访问后的不利结果的风险最多。本研究的整体目标是审查CGA对未分化的虚弱老年人群的保健质量,安全性和成本效益的影响,以呈现给ED和急性医学评估单位的医疗投诉。这将是一个平行的1:1分配随机控制试验。所有≥75岁的患者都会使用风险(ISAR)工具的鉴定识别脆弱的患者。 ISAR上得分≥2的人将是随机的。治疗部队将在ED或急性医学评估单位进行老年医学团队LED CGA,而非治疗臂将经过通常的患者护理。专业的大学医学医生,高级物理治疗师,专业护士,药剂师,高级职业治疗师和高级医疗社会工作者的专业多学科团队将进行评估,以及从该评估中产生的干预措施。主要结果将是ED或急性医学评估单位的逗留时间。二次结果将包括ED再次出勤,重新住院,功能下降,寿命质量和30岁及180天的死亡率。这些将由由盲目分配的研究护士进行电话咨询和电子记录来确定。从卫生服务行政(HSE)中西部地区医院研究伦理委员会(088/2020)获得道德批准。我们的划分传播战略将与老年人研究中心的老年人的患者和公众参与利益相关者小组合作,我们将在同行评审期刊和国家和国际会议上展示我们的调查结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号