首页> 外文期刊>Social Media + Society >Constructing Sexual Fields: Chinese Gay Men’s Dating Practices Among Pluralized Dating Apps
【24h】

Constructing Sexual Fields: Chinese Gay Men’s Dating Practices Among Pluralized Dating Apps

机译:建立性领域:中国同性恋者在多元约会应用中的约会实践

获取原文
       

摘要

In this study, we draw on sexual field theory to examine the structural nature of metropolitan Chinese gay men’s mobile dating practices in a polymedia environment where one can access an array of dating apps. We define structures of desire in the sexual field as not only the transpersonal valuations of desirability but also the dominance of particular desires that coordinate actors’ expectations and practices. Based on interviews with 52 urban Chinese gay men, we discuss the differing structures of desire hosted by four dating apps: Aloha, Blued, Grindr, and Tinder. Our analysis indicates that factors such as design features of dating apps, marketing strategies of app companies, and internet regulations have shaped the structures of desire by unevenly distributing the platform access to users across social classes and territorial divisions and (dis)enabling particular communicative practices in collective sexual life to different extents. The distance-sorted display of nearby users contributes to the predominance of immediate hook-ups on Blued and Grindr, while the matching mechanism of Aloha and Tinder functions as a “speed bump” and nourishes users’ expectations for lasting connections. As Blued is the most popular gay dating app on the heavily guarded Chinese internet market, the diversity of its users drives away many metropolitan middle-class gay men who only desire their own kind. In comparison, Aloha, Grindr, and Tinder, with smaller user bases, are more specialized sexual sites where the dominant currency of sexual capital reflects the form of the middle-class standard for “quality.”.
机译:在这项研究中,我们借鉴了性领域理论,以研究Metropolitan Mymer Mover Mens的Mobile Date练习的结构性质,其中一个人可以访问一系列约会应用程序。我们在性田中定义了欲望的结构,不仅是可取性的横向级估值,而且特别希望协调演员的期望和实践的主导地位。根据与52个城市同性恋男子的访谈,我们讨论了四个约会应用程序所在的欲望的不同结构:Aloha,Blued,Grindr和Tinder。我们的分析表明,通过不均匀地分配社会阶层和领海和(DIS)的平台访问(DIS)来实现特定交际实践的平台获取,旨在实现欲望的欲望,营销策略和互联网法规等因素在集体性生活中到不同的范围。附近用户的距离分类显示有助于直接连接Blouge和Grindr的占主导地位,而Aloha和Tinder的匹配机制可以作为“速度凹凸”并营造用户对持久连接的期望。由于Blouge是守卫中国互联网市场上最受欢迎的同性恋约会应用程序,其用户的多样性驾驶了许多只渴望自己的大都市中产阶级同性恋者。相比之下,具有较小的用户基础的Aloha,Grindr和Tinder是更专业的性地,性资本的主要货币反映了“质量”中产阶级标准的形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号