首页> 外文期刊>Social Media + Society >“Crystal Is Creepy, but Cool”: Mapping Folk Theories and Responses to Automated Personality Recognition Algorithms
【24h】

“Crystal Is Creepy, but Cool”: Mapping Folk Theories and Responses to Automated Personality Recognition Algorithms

机译:“水晶是令人毛骨悚然的,但很酷”:映射民间理论和自动性格识别算法的回应

获取原文
       

摘要

This article examines Crystal Knows, a company that generates automated personality profiles through an algorithm and sells access to their database. These algorithms are the result of a long line of research into computational and predictive algorithms that track social media practices and uses them to infer individual characteristics and make psychometric assessments. Although it is now computationally possible, these algorithms are not widely known or understood by the general public. Little is known about how people would respond to them, particularly when they do not even know their online activities are being assessed by the algorithm. This study examines how people construct “snap” folk theories about the ways personality algorithms operate as well as how they react when shown their outputs. Through qualitative interviews ( n ?=?37) with people after being presented with their own profile, this study identifies a series of folk theories that people came up with to explain the personality algorithm across four dimensions (data source, scope, collection process, and outputs). In addition, this study examined how those folk theories contributed to certain reactions, fears, and justifications people had about the algorithm. This study builds on our theoretical understanding of folk theory literature as well as certain limitations of algorithmic transparency/sovereignty when these types of inferential and predictive algorithms get coupled with people’s hopes and fears about employment, hiring, and promotion.
机译:本文审查了Crysty Nows,这是一家通过算法生成自动人格配置文件的公司,并销售对其数据库的访问。这些算法是长期研究的结果,进入追踪社交媒体实践的计算和预测算法,并使用它们来推断各个特征并进行心理测量评估。虽然现在可以计算出来,但是这些算法并不广泛地知道或由公众广泛地了解或理解。众所周知,人们如何回应它们,特别是当他们甚至不知道算法时不知道他们的在线活动时。本研究探讨了人们如何构建“捕捉”民间理论,了解个性算法的方式运行方式以及它们在向输出显示的情况下的反应方式。通过定性访谈(n?= 37)与人们在呈现自己的个人资料之后,这项研究确定了一系列人们提出的民间理论,以解释四个维度的个性算法(数据源,范围,收集过程,和产出)。此外,本研究审查了那些民间理论对某些反应,恐惧和理由有关人员对算法的影响。这项研究建立了我们对民间理论文学的理论理解,以及当这些类型的推理和预测算法加上人们希望和担心就业,招聘和促销时,算法透明度/主权的某些限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号