...
首页> 外文期刊>Research & Politics >Do anti-poverty policies sway voters? Evidence from a meta-analysis of Conditional Cash Transfers
【24h】

Do anti-poverty policies sway voters? Evidence from a meta-analysis of Conditional Cash Transfers

机译:反贫取放政策摇摆选民吗? 来自条件现金转移的META分析的证据

获取原文

摘要

Since the 1990s, many governments in middle and low-income countries have used conditional cash transfers to alleviate poverty. However, the evidence of the electoral consequences of this type of anti-poverty intervention remains inconclusive. Do voters reward politicians when they implement conditional cash transfers? This study conducts a meta-analysis using a sample of 10 randomized controlled trials and regression discontinuity designs (35 estimates from six countries in Latin America and Asia) to address this question. The result shows a positive effect of conditional cash transfers on voter support for the incumbents and no evidence of publication bias in the selected sample. Estimated effect sizes tend to be larger in observational studies, unpublished manuscripts, and articles published in political science. These results provide more conclusive evidence that poor voters also respond to non-clientelistic strategies of electoral targeting in developing countries.
机译:自20世纪90年代以来,中低收入国家的许多政府都使用有条件的现金转移来减轻贫困。 但是,这种类型的反贫困干预的选举后果的证据仍然不确定。 选民在实施条件现金转移时是否奖励政治家? 本研究使用10个随机对照试验和回归不连续性设计的样本进行了荟萃分析(拉丁美洲和亚洲六个国家的35次估计)来解决这个问题。 结果表明,条件现金转移对现任者的投票支持以及所选样品中没有出版物偏见的证据。 在政治学中公布的观察研究,未发表的手稿和文章中估计效果大小往往更大。 这些结果提供了更多的确凿证据,即贫困选民也应对发展中国家的选举目标的非客户态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号