...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of clinical pharmacology >Comprehensive evaluation of microneedle-based intradermal adalimumab delivery vs. subcutaneous administration: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial
【24h】

Comprehensive evaluation of microneedle-based intradermal adalimumab delivery vs. subcutaneous administration: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial

机译:综合评价微针的皮卡替洛单抗递送与皮下给药:随机对照临床试验的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims To evaluate feasibility of intradermal (i.d.) adalimumab administration using hollow microneedles, and to compare a single i.d. dose of adalimumab using a hollow microneedle with a single subcutaneous (s.c.) dose using a conventional needle. Methods In this single-centre double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy clinical trial in 24 healthy adults we compared 40 mg adalimumab (0.4 mL) administered i.d. using a hollow microneedle with a s.c. dose using a conventional needle. Primary parameters were pain, acceptability and local tolerability; secondary parameters safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. We explored usability of optical coherence tomography, clinical photography, thermal imaging, and laser speckle contrast imaging to evaluate skin reaction after i.d. injections. In vitro protein analysis was performed to assess compatibility of adalimumab with the hollow microneedle device. Results While feasible and safe, injection pain of i.d. adalimumab was higher compared to s.c. adalimumab (35.4 vs . 7.9 on a 100-point visual analogue scale). Initial absorption rate and relative bioavailability were higher after i.d. adalimumab (time to maximum plasma concentration = 95 h [47–120]; F rel = 129% [6.46%]) compared to s.c. adalimumab (time to maximum plasma concentration = 120 h [96–221]). Anti-adalimumab antibodies were detected in 50% and 83% of the subjects after i.d. and s.c. adalimumab, respectively. We observed statistically significantly more erythema and skin perfusion after i.d. adalimumab, compared to s.c. adalimumab and placebo injections ( P .0001). Cytokine secretion after whole blood lipopolysaccharide challenge was comparable between administration routes. Conclusions Intradermal injection of adalimumab using hollowing microneedles was perceived as more painful and less accepted than s.c. administration, but yields a higher relative bioavailability with similar safety and pharmacodynamic effects.
机译:旨在使用中空微针来评估皮内(I.D.)Adalimalab施用的可行性,并比较单个I.D.使用具有常规针的具有中空微针的空心微针剂量的剂量的Adalimumab。方法在24例健康成年人中的单一中心双盲,安慰剂控制,双伪临床试验中,我们将40mg Adalimalab(0.4ml)相提并为I.D。使用带有S.C的空心微针。使用传统针的剂量。主要参数是疼痛,可接受性和局部耐受性;二次参数安全,药代动力学和免疫原性。我们探讨了光学相干性断层扫描,临床摄影,热成像和激光散斑对比度成像的可用性,以评估I.D的皮肤反应。注射。进行体外蛋白质分析,以评估用空心微针装置的Adalimalab的相容性。结果,同时可行,安全,注射疼痛。与S.C相比,Adalimumab更高。 Adalimumab(35.4 vs.7.9在100点视觉模拟刻度上)。在I.D之后,初始吸收率和相对生物利用度更高。与S.C相比,Adalimumab(最大血浆浓度= 95h [47-120]); F rel = 129%[6.46%])。 Adalimumab(最大血浆浓度的时间= 120h [96-221])。在I.D中以50%和83%的受试者中检测抗AdalimumAb抗体。和S.C. Adalimumab分别。在i.d之后,我们观察到统计上显着更明显的红斑和皮肤灌注。与S.C相比,Adalimumab. Adalimalab和安慰剂注射(P&lt ;0001)。在整个血液多糖攻击后的细胞因子分泌在给药途径之间相当。结论使用中空微针的皮内注射Adalimimab被认为是比S.C更痛苦,更少接受。给药,但产生具有相似安全性和药效学效应的相对生物利用度更高。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号