首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology >FUZZY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (FAHP) USING GEOMETRIC MEAN METHOD TO SELECT BEST PROCESSING FRAMEWORK ADEQUATE TO BIG DATA
【24h】

FUZZY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (FAHP) USING GEOMETRIC MEAN METHOD TO SELECT BEST PROCESSING FRAMEWORK ADEQUATE TO BIG DATA

机译:模糊分析层次处理(FAHP)使用几何平均法选择最佳处理框架适用于大数据

获取原文
       

摘要

Big data is considered a hotspot, as all organizations realize the importance of their big data to gain insights that help organizations develop and understand consumer requirements. Big data needs large storage capacity and strong processing frameworks in order to clean, process, and analyze it. Fortunately, cloud computing offers many services and processing frameworks that facilitate the storage and processing of big data. But the issue here is how to choose the best suited processing framework for big data of financial services. The best processing framework is chosen based on big data criteria and financial services requirements. We used MCDM methods to solve this decision problem and evaluated five big data processing frameworks (Spark, Hadoop, Flink, Storm, and Samza) based on twelve criteria. These criteria were collected from previous researches. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is a powerful and simple method of MCDM methods, but many of researchers believe that it has some weakness due to some uncertainty issues. Many researchers have preferred to combine fuzzy set theory with AHP to solve the uncertainty problem. This work introduces fuzzy AHP using geometric mean method in cloud service selection based-problem. The results show that Hadoop framework has the highest level of security, availability, scalability,and compatability, but has the heighest cost. Spark has the highest storage capacity , speed, and best processing mode at lower cost. Flink has the best usability, and processing. Storm has the best performance, sustainability, and is the cheapest. The validity of our results and the robustness of our hybird proposal were aproved by applying sensitivity analysis.
机译:大数据被认为是一个热点,因为所有组织都意识到他们的大数据的重要性,以获得帮助组织发展和理解消费者要求的洞察力。大数据需要大存储容量和强大的处理框架,以清洁,处理和分析它。幸运的是,云计算提供了许多服务和处理框架,便于存储和处理大数据。但此处的问题是如何选择最适合的财务服务的大数据处理框架。基于大数据标准和金融服务要求选择最佳处理框架。我们使用MCDM方法来解决此决策问题,并根据十二个标准评估五个大数据处理框架(Spark,Hadoop,Flink,Storm和Samza)。从以前的研究中收集了这些标准。分析层次过程(AHP)是一种强大而简单的MCDM方法方法,但许多研究人员认为,由于一些不确定性问题,它具有一些弱点。许多研究人员更愿意将模糊集理论与AHP结合起来解决不确定性问题。基于云服务选择中的几何平均方法,这项工作介绍了模糊AHP。结果表明,Hadoop框架具有最高的安全性,可用性,可扩展性和兼容性,但具有最高的成本。火花具有最高的存储容量,速度和最佳处理模式,以较低的成本。 Flink具有最佳可用性和处理。风暴具有最佳的性能,可持续性,是最便宜的。通过应用敏感性分析,我们的结果的有效性和我们的悬息提案的稳健性得到了尊重。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号