...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis >One extraction tool for in vitro-in vivo extrapolation? SPME-based metabolomics of in?vitro 2D, 3D, and in?vivo mouse melanoma models
【24h】

One extraction tool for in vitro-in vivo extrapolation? SPME-based metabolomics of in?vitro 2D, 3D, and in?vivo mouse melanoma models

机译:在体外体内的一种提取工具外推? 基于SPME的 In?体外> 2d,3d和在Δvivo小鼠黑色素瘤模型中

获取原文
           

摘要

Solid phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with high-resolution mass spectrometry was employed for the determination of metabolomic profile of mouse melanoma growth within in?vitro 2D, in?vitro 3D, and in?vivo models. Such multi-model approach had never been investigated before. Due to the low-invasiveness of SPME, it was possible to perform time-course analysis, which allowed building time profile of biochemical reactions in the studied material. Such approach does not require the multiplication of samples as subsequent analyses are performed from the very same cell culture or from the same individual. SPME already reduces the number of animals required for experiment; therefore, it is with good concordance with the 3Rs rule (replacement, reduction, and refinement). Among tested models, the largest number of compounds was found within the in vitro 2D cell culture model, while in?vivo and in vitro 3D models had the lowest number of detected compounds. These results may be connected with a higher metabolic rate, as well as lower integrity of the in vitro 2D model compared to the in vitro 3D model resulting in a lower number of compounds released into medium in the latter model. In terms of in?vitro-in?vivo extrapolation, the in vitro 2D model performed more similar to in?vivo model compared to in vitro 3D model; however, it might have been due to the fact that only compounds secreted to medium were investigated. Thus, in further experiments to obtain full metabolome information, the intraspheroidal assessment or spheroid dissociation would be necessary.
机译:使用固相微萃取(SPME)与高分辨率质谱相结合,用于测定体外2D中的小鼠黑色素瘤生长的代谢型剖面,在β体外3D和α体内模型中。这种多模型方法从未在以前进行了调查过。由于SPME的低侵袭性,可以执行时间课程分析,其允许在研究中建造生化反应的时间轮廓。这种方法不需要样品的乘法,因为随后的分析是从相同的细胞培养物或来自同一个体的。 SPME已经减少了实验所需的动物数量;因此,它与3RS规则(更换,减少和改进)具有良好的一致性。在测试模型中,在体外2D细胞培养模型中发现了最大数量的化合物,而在α体内和体外3D模型中具有最低次数的检测到的化合物。与体外3D模型相比,这些结果可以以较高的代谢速率与较高的代谢率连接,以及较低的体外2D模型的完整性,导致后者模型中释放到介质中的较少数量的化合物。就体外β体内推断而言,与体外3D模型相比,体外2D模型与体内模型更相似;然而,它可能是由于研究分泌给培养基的化合物。因此,在进一步的实验中获得完全代谢信息,是必要的缠绕手术评估或球状解离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号