首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematics Research >A Comprehensive Comparison of Label Setting Algorithm and Dynamic Programming Algorithm in Solving Shortest Path Problems
【24h】

A Comprehensive Comparison of Label Setting Algorithm and Dynamic Programming Algorithm in Solving Shortest Path Problems

机译:求解最短路径问题的标签设定算法和动态编程算法的全面比较

获取原文
           

摘要

In this paper, Label Setting Algorithm and Dynamic Programming Algorithm had been critically examined in determining the shortest path from one source to a destination. Shortest path problems are for finding a path with minimum cost from one or more origin (s) to one or more destination(s) through a connected network. A network of ten (10) cities (nodes) was employed as a numerical example to compare the performance of the two algorithms. Both algorithms arrived at the optimal distance of 11 km, which corresponds to the paths 1 → 4 → 5 → 8 → 10,1 → 3 → 5 → 8 → 10 , 1 → 2 → 6 → 9 → 10 and 1 → 4 → 6 → 9 → 10 . Thus, the problem has multiple shortest paths. The computational results evince the outperformance of Dynamic Programming Algorithm, in terms of time efficiency, over the Label Setting Algorithm. Therefore, to save time, it is recommended to apply Dynamic Programming Algorithm to shortest paths and other applicable problems over the Label-Setting Algorithm.
机译:在本文中,在确定从一个源到目的地的最短路径时,标签设置算法和动态编程算法已经过分检查。最短路径问题用于通过连接的网络从一个或多个源代理到一个或多个目的地找到一个或多个目的地的路径。使用十(10)个城市(节点)的网络作为数字示例,以比较两种算法的性能。这两种算法都到达了11km的最佳距离,对应于路径1→4→5→8→10,1→3→5→8→10,100→2→6→9→10和1→4→ 6→9→10。因此,问题具有多个最短路径。在标签设置算法上,计算结果Evince Evince在时间效率方面的动态编程算法的表现。因此,为了节省时间,建议将动态编程算法应用于通过标签设置算法的最短路径和其他适用问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号