首页> 外文期刊>Yonsei Medical Journal >Comparison of Automated Brain Volume Measures by NeuroQuant vs. Freesurfer in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Effect of Slice Thickness
【24h】

Comparison of Automated Brain Volume Measures by NeuroQuant vs. Freesurfer in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Effect of Slice Thickness

机译:温和认知障碍患者神经夸张与弗雷温夫自动化脑体积措施的比较:切片厚度的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

PURPOSE:This study aimed to examine the inter-method reliability and volumetric differences between NeuroQuant (NQ) and Freesurfer (FS) using T1 volume imaging sequence with different slice thicknesses in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).MATERIALS AND METHODS:This retrospective study enrolled 80 patients diagnosed with MCI at our memory clinic. NQ and FS were used for volumetric analysis of three-dimensional T1-weighted images with slice thickness of 1 and 1.2 mm. Inter-method reliability was measured with Pearson correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and effect size (ES).RESULTS:Overall, NQ volumes were larger than FS volumes in several locations: whole brain (0.78%), cortical gray matter (5.34%), and white matter (2.68%). Volume measures by NQ and FS showed good-to-excellent ICCs with both 1 and 1.2 mm slice thickness (ICC=0.75-0.97, ES=-1.0-0.73 vs. ICC=0.78-0.96, ES=-0.9-0.77, respectively), except for putamen, pallidum, thalamus, and total intracranial volumes. The ICCs in all locations, except the putamen and cerebellum, were slightly higher with a slice thickness of 1 mm compared to those of 1.2 mm.CONCLUSION:Inter-method reliability between NQ and FS was good-to-excellent in most regions with improvement with a 1-mm slice thickness. This finding indicates that the potential effects of slice thickness should be considered when performing volumetric measurements for cognitive impairment.? Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2021.
机译:目的:本研究旨在使用具有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的患者不同的切片厚度的T1体积成像序列来检查神经夸(NQ)和FreSurfer(FS)之间的方法间可靠性和体积差异(FS)。材料和方法:这种回顾性研究注册了80名患者,诊断诊断MCI。 NQ和FS用于三维T1加权图像的体积分析,切片厚度为1和1.2mm。使用Pearson相关系数(R),脑内相关系数(ICC)和效果大小测量的方法间可靠性。结果:总体而言,NQ卷大于几个地点的FS卷:全大脑(0.78%),皮质灰质(5.34%)和白质(2.68%)。 NQ和FS的音量测量显示出具有1和1.2 mm的良好的ICC,分别为1和1.2 mm切片厚度(ICC = 0.75-0.97,ES = -1.0-0.73 Vs.ICC = 0.78-0.96,ES = -0.9-0.77 ),除了腐饼,苍白,丘脑和总颅内体积。除腐库和小脑外的所有位置外的ICC,与1.2 mm相比,切片厚度为1mm的切片厚度略高。结论:在大多数具有改进的地区,NQ和FS之间的方法间可靠性很好厚度为1毫米。该发现表明,在对认知障碍进行体积测量时,应考虑切片厚度的潜在效果。?版权所有:延世大学医学院2021。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号