Mesosaur taxonomy reappraisal: are Stereosternum and Brazilosaurus valid taxa?

摘要

Mesosaurs are basal amniotes that lived at the beginning of the Permian or close to the Permo–Carboniferous boundary. Despite the several hundred specimens that have been found, including complete skeletons of adult and juvenile individuals, mesosaur taxonomy has been subjected to a high controversy over time. Currently, three monotypic genera, Mesosaurus tenuidens Gervais, StereosternumtumidumCope, and Brazilosaurus sanpauloensis Shikama & Ozaki are recognized, but identification of new specimens using the available diagnostic characters are arbitrary and influenced by high subjectivity. We performed anatomical and morphometric analyses to look for statistical support to these previously suggested basic diagnostic characters through an exhaustive anatomical revision of these characters and also of some new attributes discovered during the course of our study. We found a notable influence of taphonomic features in most of the diagnostic characters used to differentiate the three monotypic genera, including strong bias derived from the preservation of individuals in different ontogenetic stages, whose size and degree of ossification could have been controlled by particular environmental conditions that resulted in subtle polymorphisms of these and other few characters. Other features may even represent sexual dimorphism. After the detailed revision of the type specimens of the three currently acepted mesosaur taxa, for which we include here good-quality photographs, and considering the lack of statistical support for the most applied putative diagnostic features such as the different ratio found when comparing skull and cervical region lengths and the low or higher intensity of pachyosteosclerosis observed in dorsal ribs, which can be controlled by taphonomic and ecological conditions, we recognize Mesosaurus as the only mesosaurid taxon in the Paraná and Karoo basins, probably including dwarf individuals. Therefore, S.tumidum and B. sanpauloensis are suggested here as nomina dubia taking into account that the autapomorphies that supported these taxa cannot be confirmed to be absent in Mesosaurus.