首页> 外文期刊>NPJ precision oncology. >Computer extracted gland features from H&E predicts prostate cancer recurrence comparably to a genomic companion diagnostic test: a large multi-site study
【24h】

Computer extracted gland features from H&E predicts prostate cancer recurrence comparably to a genomic companion diagnostic test: a large multi-site study

机译:H&E的计算机提取的腺体特征预测与基因组伴随诊断测试相当的前列腺癌复发:大型多网站研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Existing tools for post-radical prostatectomy (RP) prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR) prognosis rely on human pathologist-derived parameters such as tumor grade, with the resulting inter-reviewer variability. Genomic companion diagnostic tests such as Decipher tend to be tissue destructive, expensive, and not routinely available in most centers. We present a tissue non-destructive method for automated BCR prognosis, termed "Histotyping", that employs computational image analysis of morphologic patterns of prostate tissue from a single, routinely acquired hematoxylin and eosin slide. Patients from two institutions (n?=?214) were used to train Histotyping for identifying high-risk patients based on six features of glandular morphology extracted from RP specimens. Histotyping was validated for post-RP BCR prognosis on a separate set of n?=?675 patients from five institutions and compared against Decipher on n?=?167 patients. Histotyping was prognostic of BCR in the validation set (p??0.001, univariable hazard ratio [HR]?=?2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.03–3.93, concordance index [c-index]?=?0.68, median years-to-BCR: 1.7). Histotyping was also prognostic in clinically stratified subsets, such as patients with Gleason grade group 3 (HR?=?4.09) and negative surgical margins (HR?=?3.26). Histotyping was prognostic independent of grade group, margin status, pathological stage, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (multivariable p??0.001, HR?=?2.09, 95% CI: 1.40–3.10, n?=?648). The combination of Histotyping, grade group, and preoperative PSA outperformed Decipher (c-index?=?0.75 vs. 0.70, n?=?167). These results suggest that a prognostic classifier for prostate cancer based on digital images could serve as an alternative or complement to molecular-based companion diagnostic tests.
机译:现有工具用于后自由基前列腺切除术(RP)前列腺癌生物化学复发(BCR)预后依赖于人体病理学家衍生的参数,如肿瘤级,由此产生的审查者的可变性。基因组伴侣诊断试验如破译往往是组织破坏,昂贵,而不是在大多数中心的常规提供。我们提出了一种用于自动BCR预后的组织未破坏方法,称为“组织型”,该方法采用来自单个,常规获得的苏木精和曙红载玻片的前列腺组织形态学模式的计算图像分析。来自两个机构的患者(N?= 214)用于训练基于从RP样本提取的六种腺体形态的六种特征来训练鉴定高风险患者的组织分型。组织分型在单独的N?= 675名患者中验证了RP后BCR预后的验证,并与N?= 167例患者的破译进行了比较。组织分型在验证组中是BCR的预后(P?& 0.001,单次危险比[HR]?=?2.83,95%置信区间[CI]:2.03-3.93,一致性指数[C-Index]?=? 0.68,中位数年至-BCR:1.7)。组织型在临床分层的子集中也在预后,例如Gleason级组3的患者(HR?= 4.09)和阴性手术边距(HR?= 3.26)。组织分型是预后独立于级组,边缘状态,病理阶段和术前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)(多变量P≤1.001,HR?2.09,95%CI:1.40-3.10,N?=? 648)。组织分型,级组和术前PSA的组合优于翻译(C折射率?= 0.75与0.70,N?=?167)。这些结果表明,基于数字图像的前列腺癌的预后分类剂可以作为基于分子的伴随诊断测试的替代或补充。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号