首页> 外文期刊>Fluids >Effects of Reaction Mechanisms and Differential Diffusion in Oxy-Fuel Combustion Including Liquid Water Dilution
【24h】

Effects of Reaction Mechanisms and Differential Diffusion in Oxy-Fuel Combustion Including Liquid Water Dilution

机译:反应机理和差动扩散在氧燃料燃烧中的影响,包括液体稀释

获取原文
           

摘要

The influence of chemistry and differential diffusion transport modeling on methane oxy-fuel combustion is analyzed considering different diluent characteristics. Analyses are conducted in terms of numerical simulations using a detailed description of the chemistry. Herein, different reaction mechanisms are employed to represent the combustion of methane. Simulations were performed with the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code CHEM1D following different numerical setups, freely propagating flame, counter flow flame, and propagating flame in droplet mist reactors. The employed method is validated against experimental data and simulation results available in the literature. While the counter-flow flame reactor is exclusively used in the validation stage, different scenarios have been established for propagating flame simulations, as in single- or two-phase flow configuration. These comprehend variations in diluent compositions, reaction mechanisms, and different models to account for diffusion transport. Conducted investigations show that the choice for a specific reaction mechanism can interfere with computed flame speed values, which may agree or deviate from experimental observations. The achieved outcomes from these investigations indicate that the so-called GRI 3.0 mechanism is the best option for general application purposes, as a good balance is found between accuracy and computational efforts. However, in cases where more detailed information and accuracy are required, the CRECK C1-C3 mechanism demonstrated to be the best choice from the evaluated mechanisms. Additionally, the results clearly indicate that commonly applied simplifications to general flame modeling as the unitary Lewis number and mixture averaged approach strongly interfere with the computation of flame propagation speed values for single- and two-phase flows. While the application of unitary Lewis number approach is limited to certain conditions, the mixture averaged approach demonstrated a good agreement with the complex model for flame speed computations in the various tested scenarios. Such an outcome is not limited to oxy-fuel applications, but are straightly extensible to oxy-steam and air-blown combustion.
机译:考虑不同稀释剂特性,分析了化学和差分扩散传递建模对甲烷氧燃料燃烧的影响。通过使用化学的详细描述,根据数值模拟进行分析。这里,采用不同的反应机制来表示甲烷的燃烧。在不同数值设置之后的计算流体动力学(CFD)代码CHEM1D,在液滴雾反应器中自由地传播火焰,逆流火焰和传播火焰,进行仿真。采用的方法针对文献中提供的实验数据和仿真结果验证。虽然逆流火焰反应器专门用于验证阶段,但已经建立了用于传播火焰模拟的不同场景,如单相或两相流配置。这些理解稀释剂组合物,反应机制和不同模型的变化,以考虑扩散传输。进行的调查表明,特定反应机制的选择可以干扰计算的火焰速度值,其可以达成或偏离实验观察。从这些调查中实现的结果表明所谓的GRI 3.0机制是一般申请目的的最佳选择,因为在准确性和计算努力之间存在良好的平衡。然而,在需要更详细的信息和准确性的情况下,克鲁克C1-C3机制证明是评估机制的最佳选择。另外,结果清楚地表明,作为整体火焰建模的通常应用简化作为整体lewis号和混合物平均方法强烈地干扰了对单相和两相流量的火焰传播速度值的计算。虽然单一lewis编号方法的应用仅限于某些条件,但混合机平均方法与各种测试场景中的火焰速度计算的复杂模型表现出良好的一致性。这种结果不限于氧气燃料应用,但是直接与氧气蒸汽和空气燃烧的燃烧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号