首页> 外文期刊>Alzheimer s Research & Therapy >Disparities in the participation and adherence of older adults in lifestyle-based multidomain dementia prevention and the motivational role of perceived disease risk and intervention benefits: an observational ancillary study to a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Disparities in the participation and adherence of older adults in lifestyle-based multidomain dementia prevention and the motivational role of perceived disease risk and intervention benefits: an observational ancillary study to a randomised controlled trial

机译:老年人参与和遵守生活方式的多麦田痴呆预防和感知疾病风险和干预效益的动机作用:对随机对照试验的观察辅助研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Preventive interventions for dementia are urgently needed and must be tested in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Selection (volunteer) bias may limit efficacy, particularly in trials testing multidomain interventions and may also be indicative of disparities in intervention uptake in real-world settings. We identified factors associated with participation and adherence in a 3-year RCT of multidomain lifestyle intervention and/or omega-3 supplementation for prevention of cognitive decline and explored reasons for (non-) participation. Ancillary study during recruitment and follow-up of the 3-year Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial (MAPT) conducted in in 13 memory centres in France and Monaco, involving 1630 community-dwelling dementia-free individuals aged ≥ 70 who were pre-screened for MAPT (1270 participated in MAPT; 360 declined to participate). Response rates were 76% amongst MAPT participants and 53% amongst non-participants. Older individuals (odds ratio 0.94 [95% confidence interval 0.91–0.98] and those with higher anxiety (0.61 [0.47–0.79]) were less likely to participate in the trial. Those with higher income (4.42 [2.12–9.19]) and family history (1.60 [1.10–2.32]) or greater fear (1.73 [1.30–2.29]) of dementia were more likely to participate, as were those recruited via an intermediary (e.g. pension funds, local Alzheimer’s associations, University of the 3rd Age, sports clubs) (2.15 [1.45–3.20]). MAPT participants living in larger towns (0.71 [0.55–0.92]) and with higher depressive symptoms (0.94 [0.90–0.99]) were less likely to adhere to the interventions. Greater perceived social support (1.21 [1.03–1.43]) and cognitive function (1.37 [1.13–1.67]) predicted better adherence. Descriptively, the most frequent reasons for accepting and refusing to participate were, respectively, altruism and logistical constraints, but underlying motivations mainly related to (lack of) perceived benefits. Disparities in uptake of health interventions persist in older age. Those most at risk of dementia may not participate in or adhere to preventive interventions. Barriers to implementing lifestyle changes for dementia prevention include lack of knowledge about potential benefits, lack of support networks, and (perceived) financial costs. NCT00672685 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
机译:迫切需要痴呆的预防性干预措施,必须在随机对照试验(RCT)中进行测试。选择(志愿者)偏见可能限制疗效,特别是在试验中测试多畴干预的试验,也可能表明在现实世界环境中的干预吸收中的差异。我们确定了与参与和遵守相关的因素,在三年的多麦田生活方式干预和/或欧米茄3的补充中预防认知下降和探索(非)参与的原因。在法国和摩纳哥的13个记忆中心进行的招聘和随访期间征聘和随访,涉及1630名≥70岁的社区居住痴呆症,患者被预先筛选MAPT (1270参加MAPT; 360拒绝参加)。 Mapt参与者之间的答复率为76%,在非参与者中为53%。年龄较大的人(差异为0.94 [95%置信区间0.91-0.98]和具有更高焦虑的人(0.61 [0.61 [0.47-0.79])不太可能参加试验。收入较高的人(4.42 [2.12-9.19])和家族史(1.60 [1.10-2.32])或更大的恐惧(1.73 [1.733 [1.30-2.29])更有可能参加,就像通过中间人招募的那些(例如养老基金,当地阿尔茨海默氏症的联盟,第三次大学,体育俱乐部)(2.15 [1.45-3.20])。生活在较大城镇的MAPT参与者(0.71 [0.55-0.92])和抑郁症状更高(0.94 [0.90-0.99])不太可能遵守干预措施。更大感知社会支持(1.21 [1.03-1.43])和认知功能(1.37 [1.13-1.67])预测更好的依从性。描述,接受和拒绝参与的最常见的原因分别,利他主义和后勤限制,但潜在的动机主要与(缺乏)感知的福利有关。差异我n较老年人的健康干预措施。痴呆症风险的人可能不会参与或遵守预防性干预措施。实施痴呆症预防的生活方式变化的障碍包括缺乏关于潜在利益,缺乏支持网络的知识和(感知)财务费用。 NCT00672685(ClinicalTrials.gov)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号