首页> 外文期刊>Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal >Assessment of transferable forcefields for protein simulations attests improved description of disordered states and secondary structure propensities, and hints at multi-protein systems as the next challenge for optimization
【24h】

Assessment of transferable forcefields for protein simulations attests improved description of disordered states and secondary structure propensities, and hints at multi-protein systems as the next challenge for optimization

机译:评估蛋白质模拟的可转移力域证明了无序状态和二级结构的描述,以及多种蛋白质系统的暗示作为优化的下一个挑战

获取原文
           

摘要

Continuous assessment of transferable forcefields for molecular simulations is essential to identify their weaknesses and direct improvement efforts. The latest efforts focused on better describing disordered proteins while retaining proper description of folded domains, important because forcefields of the previous generations produce overly compact disordered states. Such improvements should additionally alleviate the related problem of over-stabilized protein–protein interactions, which has been largely overlooked. Here we evaluated three state-of-the-art forcefields, current flagships of their respective developers, optimized for ordered and disordered proteins: CHARMM36m with its recommended corrected TIP3P* water, ff19SB with the recommended OPC water, and the 2019 a99SBdisp forcefield by D. E. Shaw Research with its modified TIP4P water; plus ff14SB with TIP3P as an example of the former generation of forcefields. Our evaluation entailed simulations of (i) multiple copies of a protein that is highly soluble yet undergoes weak dimerization, (ii) a disordered peptide with low, well-characterized alpha helical propensity, and (iii) a peptide known to form insoluble β-aggregates. Our results recapitulate ff14SB-TIP3P over-stabilizing aggregates and secondary structures and place a99SBdisp-TIP4PD at the other end i.e. predicting overly weak intermolecular interactions despite reasonably predicting secondary structure propensities. In-between, CHARMM36m-TIP3P* still over-stabilizes aggregates but predicts residue-wise alpha helical propensities in solution slightly better than ff19SB-OPC, while ff19SB-OPC poses the best prediction of weak dimerization of the soluble protein still predicting aggregation of the β-peptides. This independent assessment shows that the claimed forcefield improvements are real, but also that a right balance between noncovalent attraction and repulsion has not yet been reached. We thus propose developers to consider systems like those tested here in their forcefield tuning protocols. Last, the good performance of CHARMM36m-TIP3P* further shows that tuning 3-point water models might still be an alternative to the more costly 4-point models like OPC and TIP4PD.
机译:连续评估分子模拟可转移力域是必不可少的,以确定他们的弱点和直接改进努力。最新努力的重点是更好地描述无序蛋白质,同时保留折叠域的正确描述,重要的是前几代的力场产生过于紧凑的无序状态。这种改进应另外缓解过度稳定的蛋白质相互作用的相关问题,这在很大程度上被忽视。在这里,我们评估了三个最先进的力域,其各自开发人员的现有旗舰,针对有序和无序的蛋白质进行了优化:Charmm36M,推荐的纠正钢茶*水,FF19SB与推荐的OPC水,以及2019年A99SBDISP Forcefielffect Shaw Research与其改进的Tip4p水;加上FF14SB与Tip3p作为前一代的力域。我们的评价需要(i)蛋白质的多拷贝,该蛋白质高度可溶的蛋白质较弱,(ii)具有低,表征良好的α螺旋倾向的无序肽,(iii)已知形成不溶性β-的肽 - 聚集体。我们的结果重新携带FF14SB-Tip3P过稳定的聚集体和二次结构,并在另一端放置A99SBDISP-Tip4PD。尽管有合理预测的二级结构施力,但是预测分子间相互作用过于弱的分子间相互作用。在其中,CharmM36M-Tip3P *仍然过度稳定聚集体,但在溶液中预测稍微优于FF19SB-OPC的溶液中的残留α螺旋升性,而FF19SB-OPC仍然可以预测可溶性蛋白质的弱分二化仍然预测的聚集β-肽。这种独立评估表明,所要求保护的力量域改进是真实的,但也尚未达到非价吸引力和排斥之间的正确平衡。因此,我们提出了开发人员考虑在其力场调谐协议中测试的系统。最后,CharmM36M-Tip3P的良好表现*进一步表明,调整3点水模型可能仍然是OPC和Tip4PD等更昂贵的4点模型的替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号