首页> 外文期刊>Burns Open >Does a polyurethane film improve the burn healing properties of an ionic silver hydro-fiber dressing in the treatment of minor partial-thickness burns? A retrospective review of medical records comparing healing time, patient satisfaction and medical costs in two different treatment modalities
【24h】

Does a polyurethane film improve the burn healing properties of an ionic silver hydro-fiber dressing in the treatment of minor partial-thickness burns? A retrospective review of medical records comparing healing time, patient satisfaction and medical costs in two different treatment modalities

机译:聚氨酯膜是否改善了离子银脂肪纤维敷料的烧伤愈合性能,治疗少量厚度烧伤? 对两种不同治疗方式的愈合时间,患者满意度和医疗成本进行了回顾性审查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background In the management of partial-thickness burns, insufficient data exist to recommend a specific dressing type. Silver dressings are often used, but different modalities have not been addressed. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all medical records of burns treated at Bergen Minor Injury Department for 1?year. We compared the outcome from a moist treatment protocol, using an ionic silver hydro-fiber dressing (Aquacel? Ag) with an occlusive covering with a polyurethane film dressing (Tegaderm?), with an adherent treatment protocol using the same ionic silver hydro-fiber dressing without an occlusive covering on minor partial-thickness burns. Results We included 213 patients attending Bergen Minor Injury Department (MID) with a minor partial-thickness burn during a one-year period (2018–2019). One hundred and nineteen burns were treated with an ionic silver hydro-fiber dressing and a polyurethane film dressing (Moist dressing group) and 94 wounds were treated with an ionic silver hydro-fiber dressing and dry gauze (Adherent dressing group). Most of the wounds involved less than 2% of total body surface area (TBSA) and were caused by scalds from hot liquids or contact burns from hot surfaces. The patients in the two treatment modalities had similar characteristics in respect to size, localisation, and cause of injury. Mean age was 25?years and genders were equally affected. The moist dressing group had less follow-up controls (0.45, 95% CI?=?0.21 – 0.69, p??0.05), less treatment time (2.27?days, CI 1.06–3.48, p??0.005) and a higher rate of complete healing at final follow up (65.5% versus 41.5%, p??0.005). Conclusion Treatment with an ionic silver hydro-fiber dressing and a polyurethane film showed faster healing time, higher healing rate at final follow-up and less need for follow-ups. In minor burns, the moist treatment modality should be preferred to the traditional ionic silver hydro-fiber dressing that adheres to the wound.
机译:背景技术在局部厚度烧伤的管理中,存在不足的数据以推荐特定的梳妆类型。常用银色敷料,但尚未解决不同的方式。方法我们对卑尔根轻微伤害部门治疗的烧伤的所有病程进行了回顾性审查,为1?一年。我们将来自湿润处理方案的结果进行比较,使用离子银氢纤维敷料(AquaceL?Ag),用聚氨酯薄膜敷料(Tegaderm?),具有相同的离子银氢纤维的粘附处理方案在没有闭塞覆盖物上的碎片敷料,在少量厚度燃烧中。结果313名患者在一年期间用离子银液压纤维敷料处理一百十九次烧伤,并用离子银液压纤维敷料和干燥纱布(粘附敷料组)处理聚氨酯膜敷料(湿敷料组)和94件伤口。大多数伤口涉及占总体表面积(TBSA)的2%,并且由来自热液体的烫伤或从热表面接触燃烧引起的。两种治疗方式的患者在规模,局部化和损伤原因方面具有相似的特征。平均年龄是25岁?年龄,性别同样受到影响。潮湿的敷料组具有较少的后续对照(0.45,95%CI?= 0.21-0.69,p≤≤0.05),治疗时间较少(2.27?天,C 1 1.06-3.48,P≤0.005 )在最终后续的情况下更高的完全愈合速度(65.5%,p≤≤0.005)。结论使用离子银液压纤维敷料和聚氨酯膜的处理表现出更快的愈合时间,最终随访时的愈合率较高,需要更少的随访。在轻微的烧伤中,湿润的处理方式应该优选传统的离子银氢纤维敷料,粘附在伤口上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号