首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Incidence, Management and Outcomes in Women Undergoing Peripartum Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Centre in India
【24h】

Incidence, Management and Outcomes in Women Undergoing Peripartum Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Centre in India

机译:在印度的第三级护理中心接受腹膜子宫切除术的妇女发病率,管理和结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Peripartum hysterectomy (PRH) is the surgical removal of the uterus performed in obstetrical complications such as uncontrolled postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), unrepairable uterine rupture, and sepsis. Its incidence has increased in recent years. The objective of this study was to review all the cases of PRH in a tertiary care teaching hospital over three years (January 2017-December 2019) to determine its incidence and analyse clinico-demographic characteristics in these women. Method All women undergoing PRH from January 2017 to December 2019 were included in the study. Data were collected retrospectively from medical records, of patients who underwent a PRH at the time of delivery, or within 24 hours, or performed any time before discharge from the same hospitalization and obstetric event. The total number of deliveries including caesarean and vaginal deliveries were recorded. Main outcome measures were the incidence of PRH, indication for hysterectomy, management option used, maternal outcomes (PPH, bladder injury and maternal death) and fetal outcomes (stillbirth). Results There were a total of 3904,4 deliveries; 27,337 vaginal and 11,697 caesarean sections in three years. A total of 50 patients underwent a PRH. The incidence of PRH in our study was 1.3 per 1,000 deliveries and 3.5/1,000 caesareans, respectively. PRH was found to be more common following cesarean sections than vaginal deliveries (odds ratio 22.86 [95% CI: 8.16?to?63.98]). Morbid adherent placenta (MAP) (n=30, 62%) was the most common indications of PRH. Seven (15%) women had PRH due to uterine rupture. Twenty-seven women of the 30 women (90%) with the MAP?had a previous caesarean delivery. The case fatality rate per hysterectomy was 4%. Stillbirth rate (SBR: n=8,16%) among women having PRH was seven-fold higher than overall SBR in our country. Conclusion There has been a rise in MAP as an indication of PRH in our study for a decade in comparison to uterine atony. Caesarean delivery is a significant risk factor for PRH. Previous caesarean section and major placenta previa were common occurring obstetric risk factors present in the MAP in our cohort.?Our maternal mortality in PRH was low and the stillbirth rate was high when compared with national data.
机译:背景技术Peripartum子宫切除术(PRH)是在产科并发症中进行的子宫的手术去除,例如不受控制的产后出血(PPH),未料的子宫破裂和败血症。它近年来的发病率增加了。本研究的目的是审查三年(2019年1月 - 2019年1月)在三年(2019年1月)的第三级护理教学医院中的所有案件,以确定其发病率和分析这些妇女的临床人口特征。方法从2017年1月到2019年12月接受PRH的所有女性都包含在该研究中。回顾性地从医疗记录收集数据,在交付时或在24小时内完成PRH的患者,或在从同一住院和产科活动中排出前任何时间进行。记录了包括剖腹产和阴道递送的递送总数。主要结果措施是PRH的发病率,子宫切除术,使用的管理选择,母体结果(PPH,膀胱损伤和母体死亡)和胎儿结果(死产)。结果共3904,4次交货;三年来,27,337阴道和11,697个剖腹产。共有50名患者经历了PRH。我们研究中PRH的发病率分别为每1000个递送和3.5 / 1,000名剖腹产。发现PRH更常见的循环部分比阴道递送(差距22.86 [95%CI:8.16?至?63.98])。病态粘附胎盘(地图)(n = 30,62%)是PRH最常见的指标。由于子宫破裂,七(15%)女性患有PRH。 30名女性的二十七名女性(90%)的地图?有一个以前的剖腹产。每个子宫切除术的病例率为4%。 PRH的女性中的死产率(SBR:N = 8,16%)比我国的总体SBR高七倍。结论与子宫透明的比较,地图中的崛起是我们研究中的PRH的指示。剖腹产是PRH的重要风险因素。之前的剖腹产和PREVIA的主要胎盘是常见的,在我们的队列中的地图中存在常见的产科危险因素。与国家数据相比,PRH的孕产妇死亡率低,死亡率很高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号