...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology >ARE INPATIENTS STILL MORE LIKELY TO FAIL BOWEL PREPARATION IN THE SPLIT-DOSE ERA? FINDINGS FROM 47, 292 COLONOSCOPIES IN THE SOUTHWEST ONTARIO COLONOSCOPY COHORT
【24h】

ARE INPATIENTS STILL MORE LIKELY TO FAIL BOWEL PREPARATION IN THE SPLIT-DOSE ERA? FINDINGS FROM 47, 292 COLONOSCOPIES IN THE SOUTHWEST ONTARIO COLONOSCOPY COHORT

机译:住院患者还更容易在分裂剂时代失败肠道准备吗? 47,292在西南部的Southinoio Colonocy Cohort中的调查结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Prior studies before the widespread use of split-dose bowel preparation have shown a high rate of inadequate bowel preparation in hospitalized patients. Whether this is still true in the era of split-dose bowel preparation is unknown. Aims To determine the impact of inpatient status on bowel preparation quality in the contemporary era of split-dose bowel preparation. Methods The Southwest Ontario Colonoscopy cohort consists of all inpatient and outpatient colonoscopies performed between April 2017 and Oct 2018 at 21 hospitals serving a large geographic health region. Procedures done in patients 18 years of age or by an endoscopist performing 50 colonoscopies/year were excluded. Data were collected through a mandatory quality assurance form that was completed by the endoscopist after each procedure. Pathology reports were manually reviewed. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation, defined on an ordinal scale as “good” or “fair” rather than “poor”. Secondary outcomes included adenoma detection rate (ADR), sessile serrated polyp detection rate (ssPDR), polyp detection rate (PDR), and cecal intubation rate (CIR). Results A total of 47,292 colonoscopies were performed by 75 physicians (36.2% by gastroenterologists, 60% by general surgeons, 4% others), of which 1,690 were inpatients (3.6%). Inpatients were older (mean 66.8 years vs 60.2 years, p0.0001), more co-morbid (≥ASA grade 3, 53.6% vs 23.7%, p0.0001), performed for symptomatic indications (95.7% vs 48.6%, p 0.0001), have trainee involvement (47% vs 11.6% p0.001), and less likely to receive split-dose bowel preparation (71.7% vs 91.6% p0.001). On crude analysis, inpatients were less likely to have adequate bowel preparation (86.2% vs 97.6% p0.001). On multi-variable analysis, inpatients had lower odds of achieving adequate bowel preparation (OR=0.41, 95% CI 0.33 - 0.50, p0.001), lower ADR (OR=0.47, 95% CI 0.40 - 0.55, p0.001), lower PDR (OR=0.54, 95% CI 0.47 - 0.61 p0.001) and lower CIR (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.35 - 0.54, p0.001). Conclusions In the era of split-dose bowel preparation, inpatient status is still an important predictor of inadequate bowel preparation with resultant lower quality outcome metrics.
机译:背景技术在普遍使用分裂剂量肠道制剂之前的研究表明,住院患者的肠道准备率很高。在分裂剂量肠道准备中的时代仍然是真实的。旨在确定住院地位对分裂剂量肠道制剂的当代时代的肠道准备质量的影响。方法西南安大略省结肠综合队队列由2017年4月至2018年4月至2018年10月的所有住院患者和门诊阶层,在21家医院服务于大型地理卫生区域。在患者中完成的程序& 18岁或内窥镜表演& 50个结肠镜检查/年度被排除在外。通过强制性质量保证表格收集数据,该规定在每次程序后内窥镜师完成。病理学报告被手动审核。主要结果是足够的肠道准备,定义为“良好”或“公平”而不是“穷人”。二次结果包括腺瘤检测率(ADR),无梗塞息肉检测率(SSPDR),息肉检测率(PDR)和CECAL插管率(CIR)。结果总共47,292个结肠镜检查由75名医师(36.2%的胃肠学家,60%通过普通外科医生,4%),其中1,690例为住院患者(3.6%)。住院患者较旧(平均66.8岁60.2岁,P <0.0001),对症状性指示进行的,更具持续的(≥ASA3,53.6%,P&LT; 0.0001)(95.7%Vs 48.6%,P& 0.0001),具有实习生参与(47%与11.6%P <0.001),并且不太可能接受分裂剂量肠道制剂(71.7%Vs 91.6%P <0.001)。在粗析分析中,住院患者不太可能具有足够的肠道制剂(86.2%Vs 97.6%P <0.001)。在多变量分析中,住院患者实现了足够的肠道制剂(或= 0.41,95%CI 0.33-0.50,P <0.001),下ADR(或= 0.47,95%CI 0.40-0.55,P <0.001) ,降低PDR(或= 0.54,95%CI 0.47 - 0.61P&LT; 0.001)和下部CIR(或= 0.43,95%CI 0.35-0.54,P <0.001)。结论在分裂剂量肠道制剂时代,住院病时仍然是肠道准备不足的重要预测因子,得到了较低的质量结果指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号