首页> 外文期刊>Japanese journal of infectious diseases >Comparison between Invasive and Non-Invasive Streptococcus agalactiae Isolates from Human Adults, Based on Virulence Gene Profiles, Capsular Genotypes, Sequence Types, and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns
【24h】

Comparison between Invasive and Non-Invasive Streptococcus agalactiae Isolates from Human Adults, Based on Virulence Gene Profiles, Capsular Genotypes, Sequence Types, and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns

机译:基于毒力基因谱,荚膜基因型,序列类型和抗微生物抗性图案的人成人侵袭性和非侵入性链球菌嗜醛分离物的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

This study assessed whether invasive group B Streptococcus (GBS) isolates were similar to non-invasive isolates from adult patients. Invasive and non-invasive GBS isolates were collected from three hospitals and two laboratory centers between January 2015 and October 2019. The isolates were identified by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and amplification of the GBS-specific dltS gene. The virulence gene profiles, capsular genotypes, sequence types (STs)/clonal complexes (CCs), and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotypes/genotypes were determined for the 72 invasive and 50 non-invasive isolates that were comparatively analyzed. We observed a significantly decreased rate of rib detection in the invasive isolates compared to that in the non-invasive isolates (77.8% vs. 92.0%, P 0.05). Additionally, we found significant differences in the prevalence of CC1 (23.6% vs. 46.0%, P 0.05) and CC26 (12.5% vs. 2.0%, P 0.05) between invasive and non-invasive populations. However, there were no significant differences in the comparative data of the virulence gene profiles, capsular genotypes, other STs/CCs, and AMR phenotypes/genotypes between the two populations. These findings suggest that both invasive and non-invasive isolates share similar features in terms of virulence gene profile, capsular genotype, ST/CC, and AMR genotype/phenotype (except for the rates of rib detection and CC1/CC26 prevalence).
机译:该研究评估了侵袭性B组链球菌(GBS)分离株是否与来自成年患者的非侵入性分离物类似。从2015年1月和2019年1月至10月之间的三个医院和两个实验室中心收集了侵入性和非侵入性GBS分离物。分离株通过16S rRNA扩增子测序和GBS特异性DLTS基因的扩增鉴定。测定毒力基因谱,荚膜基因型,序列类型(STS)/克隆复合物(CCS)和抗微生物抗性(AMR)表型/基因型,用于相对分析的72个侵入性和50个非侵入性分离物。与非侵入性分离物(77.8%与92.0%,P <0.05)相比,我们观察到侵袭性分离物中的肋检测率显着降低。此外,我们发现侵袭性和非侵入性群体之间的CC1的患病率(23.6%,P&LT; 0.05)和CC26(12.5%vs.2.0%,P <0.05)的显着差异。然而,在两种群体之间的毒力基因谱,血管基因型,其他STS / CC和AMR表型/基因型的比较数据没有显着差异。这些发现表明,侵入性和非侵入性分离物在毒力基因谱,荚膜基因型,ST / CC和AMR基因型/表型方面共享类似的特征(除了肋检测和CC1 / CC26患病率之外)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号