首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Multivariable evaluation of land surface processes in forced and coupled modes reveals new error sources to the simulated water cycle in the IPSL (Institute Pierre Simon Laplace) climate model
【24h】

Multivariable evaluation of land surface processes in forced and coupled modes reveals new error sources to the simulated water cycle in the IPSL (Institute Pierre Simon Laplace) climate model

机译:强制和耦合模式中的陆地过程的多变量评估揭示了IPSL(Institute Pierre Simon Laplace)气候模型的模拟水循环的新误差源

获取原文
       

摘要

Evaluating land surface models (LSMs) using available observations is important for understanding the potential and limitations of current Earth system models in simulating water- and carbon-related variables. To reveal the error sources of a LSM, five essential climate variables have been evaluated in this paper (i.e., surface soil moisture, evapotranspiration, leaf area index, surface albedo, and precipitation) via simulations with the IPSL (Institute Pierre Simon Laplace) LSM ORCHIDEE (Organizing Carbon and Hydrology in Dynamic Ecosystems) model, particularly focusing on the difference between (i)?forced simulations with atmospheric forcing data (WATCH Forcing Data ERA-Interim – WFDEI) and (ii)?coupled simulations with the IPSL atmospheric general circulation model. Results from statistical evaluation, using satellite- and ground-based reference data, show that ORCHIDEE is well equipped to represent spatiotemporal patterns of all variables in general. However, further analysis against various landscape and meteorological factors (e.g., plant functional type, slope, precipitation, and irrigation) suggests potential uncertainty relating to freezing and/or snowmelt, temperate plant phenology, irrigation, and contrasted responses between forced and coupled mode simulations. The biases in the simulated variables are amplified in the coupled mode via surface–atmosphere interactions, indicating a strong link between irrigation–precipitation and a relatively complex link between precipitation–evapotranspiration that reflects the hydrometeorological regime of the region (energy limited or water limited) and snow albedo feedback in mountainous and boreal regions. The different results between forced and coupled modes imply the importance of model evaluation under both modes to isolate potential sources of uncertainty in the model.
机译:使用可用观察评估陆地表面模型(LSM)对于了解当前地球系统模型在模拟水和碳相关变量中的潜在和限制是重要的。为了揭示LSM的误差来源,通过与IPSL(Institute Pierre Simon Laplace)LSM模拟orchidee(组织碳和水文在动态生态系统中)模型,特别是重点关注(i)之间的差异?强制模拟与大气强制数据(观察数据时代 - 中期 - WFDEI)和(ii)耦合模拟,与IPSL大气一般耦合循环模型。统计评估结果,使用基于卫星和地面的参考数据,表明陆域提供了很好的装备,以代表所有变量的时空模式。然而,对各种景观和气象因素的进一步分析(例如,植物功能类型,坡度,降水和灌溉)表明,与冻结和/或散户,温带植物候选,灌溉和强制耦合模式模拟之间的对比反应有关的潜在不确定性。模拟变量中的偏差通过表面气氛相互作用在偶联模式中扩增,表明灌溉沉淀和沉淀 - 蒸散之间的相对复杂的连杆之间的强烈连杆,反映了该地区的水力解艺制度(能量有限或水有限)和雪地和北方地区的反馈。强制和耦合模式之间的不同结果意味着在两种模式下的模型评估的重要性,以隔离模型中的潜在不确定性的潜在来源。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号