首页> 外文期刊>Trials >0.9% Sodium chloride solution versus Plasma-Lyte 148 versus compound sodium lacTate solution in children admitted to PICU—a randomized controlled trial (SPLYT-P): study protocol for an intravenous fluid therapy trial
【24h】

0.9% Sodium chloride solution versus Plasma-Lyte 148 versus compound sodium lacTate solution in children admitted to PICU—a randomized controlled trial (SPLYT-P): study protocol for an intravenous fluid therapy trial

机译:0.9%氯化钠溶液与血浆 - Lyte 148对PICU-A随机对照试验(Spoltt-P)中的儿童乳酸钠溶液(Spoltt-P):静脉内液治疗试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Intravenous fluid therapy represents the most common intervention critically ill patients are exposed to. Hyperchloremia and metabolic acidosis associated with 0.9% sodium chloride have been observed to lead to worse outcomes, including mortality. Balanced solutions, such as Plasma-Lyte 148 and Compound Sodium Lactate, represent potential alternatives but the evidence on optimal fluid choices in critically ill children remains scarce. This study aims to demonstrate whether balanced solutions, when used as intravenous fluid therapy, are able to reduce the incidence of a rise in serum chloride level compared to 0.9% sodium chloride in critically ill children. This is a single-centre, open-label randomized controlled trial with parallel 1:1:1 assignment into three groups: 0.9% sodium chloride, Plasma-Lyte 148, and Compound Sodium Lactate solutions for intravenous fluid therapy. The intervention includes both maintenance and bolus fluid therapy. Children aged 16 years admitted to intensive care and receiving intravenous fluid therapy during the first 4 h of admission are eligible. The primary outcome measure is a ≥ 5mmol/L increase in serum chloride level within 48 h post-randomization. The enrolment target is 480 patients. The main analyses will be intention-to-treat. This study tests three types of intravenous fluid therapy in order to compare the risk of hyperchloremia associated with normal saline versus balanced solutions. This pragmatic study is thereby assessing the most common intervention in paediatric critical care. This is a single-centre open-label study with no blinding at the level of delivery of the intervention. Certain paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patient groups such as those admitted with a cardiac condition or following a traumatic brain injury are excluded from this study. The study has received ethical approval (HREC/19/QCHQ/53177: 06/06/2019). It is registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12619001244190 ) from 9th September 2019. Recruitment commenced on 12th November 2019. The primary results manuscript will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
机译:静脉内液治疗代表了最常见的患者暴露于患者的最常见的干预。已经观察到与0.9%氯化钠相关的高氯血症和代谢酸中毒,以导致较差的结果,包括死亡率。平衡溶液,例如血浆 - Lyte 148和复合乳酸钠,代表潜在的替代方案,但批评性儿童的最佳流体选择的证据仍然稀缺。本研究旨在证明是否能够在用作静脉内流体治疗时的平衡溶液,能够降低血清氯化物水平上升的发生率,而致密的儿童中的0.9%氯化钠。这是一个单中心,开放标签随机对照试验,并联1:1:1分配成三组:0.9%氯化钠,血浆 - Lyte 148和复合乳酸钠溶液,用于静脉内流体治疗。干预包括维护和推注液治疗。年龄的儿童& 16年入院期间录取重症监护和接受静脉内液体治疗符合条件。在随机后48小时内血清氯化物水平的增加是≥5mmol/ l的增加。注册目标是480名患者。主要分析将是有意治疗的。本研究试验三种类型的静脉内液体治疗,以比较与常规盐水与均衡解决方案相关的高氯血症的风险。因此,这种务实的研究是评估儿科临界护理中最常见的干预。这是一个单中心开放标签研究,在介入的交付水平上没有致盲。某些儿科重症监护单位(PICU)患者群体,如那些患有心脏病或创伤性脑损伤的人被排除在本研究之外。该研究已获得道德批准(HREC / 19 / QCHQ / 53177:06/06/2019)。它在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验登记处(ACTRN1261900124441190)于2019年9月9日起,于2019年9月9日开始招聘。2019年11月12日开始。主要业绩稿件将在同行评审期刊上发表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号