Vertebral bone marrow T2* mapping using chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation in the quantitative analysis of lumbar osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures

摘要

Background: Chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation techniques have been used for fat quantification [proton density fat fraction (PDFF)], but they also enable the assessment of bone marrow T2*, which has previously been reported to be a potential biomarker for osteoporosis and may give insight into the cause of vertebral fractures (i.e., osteoporotic vs. traumatic) and the microstructure of the bone when applied to vertebral bone marrow. Methods: The 32 patients (78.1% with low-energy osteopenic/osteoporotic fractures, mean age 72.3±9.8 years, 76% women; 21.9% with high-energy traumatic fractures, 47.3±12.8 years, no women) were frequency-matched for age and sex to subjects without vertebral fractures (n=20). All study patients underwent 3T-MRI of the lumbar spine including sagittally acquired spoiled gradient echo sequences for chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation, from which T2* values were obtained. Volumetric trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone parameters describing the three-dimensional structural integrity of trabecular bone were derived from quantitative CT. Associations between T2* measurements, fracture status and trabecular bone parameters were assessed using multivariable linear regression models. Results: Mean T2* values of non fractured vertebrae in all patients showed a significant correlation with BMD (r=?0.65, P0.001), trabecular number (TbN) (r=?0.56, P0.001) and trabecular spacing (TbSp) (r=0.61, P0.001); patients with low-energy osteoporotic vertebral fractures showed significantly higher mean T2* values than those with traumatic fractures (13.6±4.3 vs. 8.4±2.2 ms, P=0.01) as well as a significantly lower TbN (0.69±0.08 vs. 0.93±0.03 mm?1, P0.01) and a significantly larger trabecular spacing (1.06±0.16 vs. 0.56±0.08 mm, P0.01). Mean T2* values of osteoporotic patients with and without vertebral fracture showed no significant difference (13.5±3.4 vs. 15.6±3.5 ms, P=0.40). When comparing the mean T2* of the fractured vertebrae, no significant difference could be detected between low-energy osteoporotic fractures and high-energy traumatic fractures (12.6±5.4 vs . 8.1±2.4 ms, P=0.10). Conclusions: T2* mapping of vertebral bone marrow using using chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation allows for assessing osteoporosis as well as the trabecular microstructure and enables a radiation-free differentiation between patients with low-energy osteoporotic and high-energy traumatic vertebral fractures, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for bone fragility.