...
首页> 外文期刊>Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery >Ultra-high resolution computed tomography of joints: practical recommendations for acquisition protocol optimization
【24h】

Ultra-high resolution computed tomography of joints: practical recommendations for acquisition protocol optimization

机译:联合的超高分辨率计算断层扫描:采购协议优化的实际建议

获取原文

摘要

Background: To assess the influence on the spatial resolution of various Ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (CT) parameters and provide practical recommendations for acquisition protocol optimization in musculoskeletal imaging. Methods: All acquisitions were performed with an Ultra-high resolution scanner, and variations of the following parameters were evaluated: field-of-view (150–300 mm), potential (80–140 KVp), current (25–250 mAs), focal spot size (0.4×0.5 to 0.8×1.3 mm 2 ), slice thickness (0.25–0.5 mm), reconstruction matrix (512×512 to 2048×2048), and iso-centering (up to 85 mm off-center). Two different image reconstruction algorithms were evaluated: hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). CATPHAN 600 phantom images were analyzed to calculate the number of visible line pairs per centimeter (lp/cm). Task transfer function (TTF) curves were calculated to quantitatively evaluate spatial resolution. Cadaveric knee acquisitions were also performed. Results: Under the conditions studied, the factor that most intensely influenced spatial resolution was the matrix size (additional visualization of up to 8 lp/cm). Increasing the matrix from 512×512 to 2048×2048 led to a 28.2% increase in TTF10% values with a high-dose protocol and a 5.6% increase with a low-dose protocol with no change in the number of visually distinguishable line pairs. The second most important factor affecting spatial resolution was the tube output (29.6% TTF10% gain and 5 additional lp/cm visualized), followed by the reconstruction algorithm choice and lateral displacement (both with a 4 lp/cm gain). Decreasing the slice thickness from 0.5 to 0.25 mm, led to an increase of 3 lp/cm (from 17 to 20 lp/cm) and a 17.3% increase in TTF10% values with no change in the “in-plane” spatial resolution. Conclusions: This study provides practical recommendations for spatial resolution optimization using Ultra-high-resolution CT.
机译:背景:评估对各种超高分辨率计算断层扫描(CT)参数的空间分辨率的影响,并提供肌肉骨骼成像中采集协议优化的实用建议。方法:使用超高分辨率扫描仪进行所有采集,评估以下参数的变化:视野(150-300 mm),电位(80-140 kVp),电流(25-250 mas) ,焦点尺寸(0.4×0.5至0.8×1.3mm 2),切片厚度(0.25-0.5 mm),重建矩阵(512×512至2048×2048),呈符合的(高达85 mm偏心) 。评估了两个不同的图像重建算法:混合迭代重建(HIR)和基于模型的迭代重建(MBIR)。分析了CATPHAN 600幻像图像以计算每厘米(LP / cm)的可见线对的数量。计算任务传递函数(TTF)曲线以定量地评估空间分辨率。还进行了尸体膝关节恢复。结果:在研究的条件下,最强烈影响空间分辨率的因素是基质尺寸(最多8磅/厘米的额外可视化)。从512×512到2048×2048增加矩阵导致TTF10%值增加到28.2%,具有高剂量方案,用低剂量方案增加5.6%,没有变化的视觉可区分线对的数量。影响空间分辨率的第二个最重要的因素是管输出(29.6%TTF10%增益和5次额外的LP / CM可视化),其次是重建算法选择和横向位移(均具有4磅/厘米增益)。将切片厚度从0.5至0.25mm减小,导致3Lp / cm(从17至20Lp / cm)的增加,TTF10%值增加17.3%,没有变化“面内”空间分辨率。结论:本研究提供了使用超高分辨率CT的空间分辨率优化的实用建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号