...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
【24h】

Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

机译:在医院外卡骤停的心肺复苏期间骨内血管血管进入:系统审查和荟萃分析观察研究

获取原文
           

摘要

This study is aimed to investigate the association of intraosseous (IO) versus intravenous (IV) route during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science from the database inception through April 2020. Our search strings included designed keywords for two concepts, i.e. vascular access and cardiac arrest. There were no limitations implemented in the search strategy. We selected studies comparing IO versus IV access in neurological or survival outcomes after OHCA. Favourable neurological outcome at hospital discharge was pre-specified as the primary outcome. We pooled the effect estimates in random-effects models and quantified the heterogeneity by the I2 statistics. Time to intervention, defined as time interval from call for emergency medical services to establishing vascular access or administering medications, was hypothesized to be a potential outcome moderator and examined in subgroup analysis with meta-regression. Nine retrospective observational studies involving 111,746 adult OHCA patients were included. Most studies were rated as high quality according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled results demonstrated no significant association between types of vascular access and the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27–1.33; I2, 95%). In subgroup analysis, time to intervention was noted to be positively associated with the pooled OR of achieving the primary outcome (OR: 3.95, 95% CI, 1.42–11.02, p: 0.02). That is, when the studies not accounting for the variable of “time to intervention” in the statistical analysis were pooled together, the meta-analytic results between IO access and favourable outcomes would be biased toward inverse association. No obvious publication bias was detected by the funnel plot. The meta-analysis revealed no significant association between types of vascular access and neurological outcomes at hospital discharge among OHCA patients. Time to intervention was identified to be an important outcome moderator in this meta-analysis of observation studies. These results call for the need for future clinical trials to investigate the unbiased effect of IO use on OHCA CPR.
机译:本研究旨在探讨在心肺复苏(CPR)期间的骨髓内(IO)与静脉内(IV)的途径与医院外卡骤停(OHCA)的结果。我们通过4月202020年系统地搜索了数据库成立的PubMed,Embase,Cochrane库和科学网站。我们的搜索字符串包括两个概念的设计关键词,即血管访问和心脏骤停。搜索策略中没有实施的限制。我们选择了在OHCA后比较IO对神经学或生存结果中的IV访问的研究。医院出院的有利神经系统结果被预先指定为主要结果。我们在随机效应模型中汇集了效果估计,并通过I2统计量化了异质性。干预的时间,定义为从呼吁用于应急医疗服务的时间间隔,以建立血管进入或给药药物,被假设为潜在的结果调节剂,并在亚组分析中用Meta-返回检查。包括涉及111,746名成人OHCA患者的九个回顾性观测研究。根据纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华规模,大多数研究被评为高品质。汇总结果证明了血管接入类型与主要结果之间没有显着关联(大量比率[或],0.60; 95%置信区间[CI],0.27-1.33; I2,95%)。在亚组分析中,注意到干预时间与汇总或实现主要结果(或:3.95,95%CI,1.42-11.02,P:0.02)呈正相关。也就是说,当汇总在统计分析中的“干预时间”变量的研究中汇集在一起​​时,IO访问和有利结果之间的元分析结果将被偏向反向关联。漏斗情节未检测到明显的出版物偏差。荟萃分析揭示了在OHCA患者中医院出院类型的血管存取和神经系统结果之间没有显着关联。鉴定干预的时间是在该荟萃分析中的重要成果主导者,观察研究。这些结果要求未来的临床试验需要探讨IO在OHCA CPR上使用的无偏效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号