...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Was the Maternal Health Cash Transfer Programme in Nigeria Sustainable and Cost-Effective?
【24h】

Was the Maternal Health Cash Transfer Programme in Nigeria Sustainable and Cost-Effective?

机译:尼日利亚的母体健康现金转移计划是可持续和成本效益吗?

获取原文

摘要

Background: The Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P), Maternal and Child Health (MCH) was introduced by the Nigerian government to increase the use of skilled maternal health services and reduce maternal mortality. The programme, funded out of a reduction in the fuel subsidy, was implemented between October 2012 and April 2015 and incorporated a conditional cash transfer to women to encourage use of facility based maternal services. We seek to assess the incremental cost effectiveness and long term impact of the conditional cash transfer element of the programme. Methods: An impact analysis and incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of conditional cash transfers (CCTs) is undertaken taking a health service perspective toward costs of the intervention. The study was undertaken in Anambra state, comparing areas that received only the investment in health services with areas that implemented the conditional cash transfer programme. An interrupted time series analysis of the programme outputs was undertaken. These were combined with a programme costing to determine the incremental cost per output. Findings: Maternal services provided to patients in conditional cash transfer areas accelerated rapidly from the middle of 2014 until after the programme in late 2015. The costs of providing services in each Primary Health Center facility was US $52,128 in the areas that only invested in health services compared to US $90,702 in facilities that also provided cash transfers. Much of the additional cost was in managing cash transfers. The incremental cost in the cash transfer areas was $572 for delivery care and $11 for antenatal care. If the programme was to be integrated as a regular service in the public health system, the cost of a delivery is estimated to fall to $389 and to $188 if 2015 levels of activity are assumed. Conclusion: Although the cost of CCTs as originally constituted as a vertical programme are relatively high compared to other similar programmes, these would fall substantially if integrated into the main health system. There is also evidence of sustained impact beyond the end of the funding suggesting that short term programmes can lead to a long-term change in patterns of health seeking behavior.
机译:背景:尼日利亚政府推出了补贴再投资和赋权计划(SURE-P),妇幼保健(MCH),以增加熟练产妇卫生服务的使用,降低孕产妇死亡率。该计划退出了燃料补贴的减少,于2012年10月至2015年10月期间实施,并向妇女注入了有条件的现金转移,以鼓励基于基于母体服务的设施。我们试图评估该计划条件现金转移元素的增量成本效益和长期影响。方法:采取有条件现金转移(CCTS)的影响分析和增量成本效益分析,采取卫生服务视角于干预的成本。该研究在Anambra State进行,比较只收到卫生服务投资的领域与实施条件现金转移计划的领域。进行了对程序输出的中断时间序列分析。这些与计划成本核算结合,以确定每个输出的增量成本。调查结果:在2014年底,条件现金转让领域提供给病人的母亲服务,直至2015年底,在计划之后迅速加速。每次卫生中心设施提供服务的费用为仅投资卫生服务的地区的52,128美元与90,702美元的设施相比,也提供了现金转移。大部分额外费用是管理现金转移。现金转让领域的增量成本为572美元,供递送护理和11美元的产前护理。如果该计划将作为公共卫生系统的常规服务纳入常规服务,则估计交付的成本降至389美元,并在2015年度活动水平的情况下达到389美元。结论:尽管与其他类似程序相比,最初由垂直程序构成的CCTS的成本相比,但如果纳入主要卫生系统,这些将大幅下降。在资金结束时还有持续影响的证据表明短期计划可以导致健康寻求行为模式的长期变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号