...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Co-designing eHealth and Equity Solutions: Application of the Ophelia (Optimizing Health Literacy and Access) Process
【24h】

Co-designing eHealth and Equity Solutions: Application of the Ophelia (Optimizing Health Literacy and Access) Process

机译:共同设计电子健康和股权解决方案:Ophelia的应用(优化健康识字和访问)过程

获取原文

摘要

Background: The unequal access, challenges and outcomes related to using technology have created the digital divide, which leads to health inequalities. The aim of this study was to apply the Ophelia (Optimizing Health Literacy and Access) process, a widely used systematic approach to whole of community co-design, to the digital context to generate solutions to improve health and equity outcomes. Methods: This was a mixed method study. A cross-sectional survey was undertaken at 3 health organizations in Victoria, Australia using the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) as a needs assessment tool. Cluster analysis was conducted to identify subgroups with varying eHealth literacy needs. These data, combined with semi-structured interviews with clients, were used to generate vignettes representing different eHealth literacy profiles. The vignettes were presented at co-design workshops with clients and health professionals to generate solutions for digital health services improvement. Expert validation and proof-of-concept testing was explored through mapping the process against Ophelia guiding principles. Results: The cluster analyses identified 8 to 9 clusters with different profiles of eHealth literacy needs, with 4 to 6 vignettes developed to represent the eHealth literacy strengths and weaknesses of clients at each of the 3 sites. A total of 32, 43, and 32 solutions across 10 strategies were co-created based on ideas grounded in local expertise and experiences. Apart from digital solutions, non-digital solutions were frequently recommended as a strategy to address eHealth literacy needs. Expert validation identified at least half of the ideas were very important and feasible, while most of the guiding principles of the Ophelia process were successfully applied. Conclusion: By harnessing collective creativity through co-design, the Ophelia process has been shown to assist the development of solutions with the potential to improve health and equity outcomes in the digital context. Implementation of the solutions is needed to provide further evidence of the impact of the process. The suggested inclusion of non-digital solutions revealed through the co-design process reminds health organizations and policymakers that solutions should be flexible enough to suit individual needs. As such, taking a co-design approach to digital health initiatives will assist in preventing the widening of health inequalities.
机译:背景:与使用技术有关的不等程度的访问,挑战和结果创造了数字鸿沟,这导致健康不平等。本研究的目的是应用Ophelia(优化健康识字和访问)过程,广泛使用的系统方法整个社区共同设计,以产生改善健康和公平结果的数字背景。方法:这是一个混合方法研究。在维多利亚州维多利亚州的3个卫生组织进行了一个横断面调查,使用了eHealth扫盲问卷调查问卷(EHLQ)作为需求评估工具。进行集群分析以识别具有不同电子健康扫盲需求的子组。这些数据与与客户的半结构化访谈相结合,用于生成代表不同电子扫养识别型谱的Vignettes。 Vignettes介绍了与客户和卫生专业人员的共同设计研讨会,为数字健康服务改进产生了解决方案。通过对Ophelia指导原则进行绘制过程来探索专家验证和概念验证测试。结果:群集分析确定了8至9种集群,具有不同的电子健康扫盲需求,其中4到6名Vignettes,以代表3个站点中每一个的电子健康识别力量和客户的弱点。基于在当地专业知识和经验的想法基础上共同创建了共同创建了32,43和32个解决方案。除了数字解决方案之外,经常建议使用非数字解决方案作为解决电子健康素养需求的策略。专家验证确定了至少一半的想法非常重要和可行,而大多数ophelia过程的指导原则已成功应用。结论:通过通过共同设计利用集体创造力,已显示Ophelia工艺,协助开发解决方案,以改善数字背景下的健康和公平结果。需要实施解决方案,以提供进一步证明该过程的影响。建议包含非数字解决方案通过共同设计过程揭示了卫生组织和政策制定者,该解决方案应该足够灵活,以满足个人需求。因此,为数字健康倡议的共同设计方法将有助于防止卫生不平等的扩大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号