...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Medicine >Cerebral Blood Flow Deviations in Critically Ill Patients: Potential Insult Contributing to Ischemic and Hyperemic Injury
【24h】

Cerebral Blood Flow Deviations in Critically Ill Patients: Potential Insult Contributing to Ischemic and Hyperemic Injury

机译:危重病患者的脑血流偏差:潜在侮辱造成缺血性和血液损伤

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Ischemic and hyperemic injury have emerged as biologic mechanisms that contribute to cognitive impairment in critically ill patients. Spontaneous deviations in cerebral blood flow (CBF) beyond ischemic and hyperemic thresholds may represent an insult that contributes to this brain injury, especially if they accumulate over time and coincide with impaired autoregulation. Methods: We used transcranial Doppler to measure the proportion of time that CBF velocity (CBFv) deviated beyond previously reported ischemic and hyperemic thresholds in a cohort of critically ill patients with respiratory failure and/or shock within 48 h of ICU admission. We also assessed whether these CBFv deviations were more common during periods of impaired dynamic autoregulation, and whether they are explained by concurrent variations in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and end-tidal PCO 2 (PetCO 2 ). Results: We enrolled 12 consecutive patients (three females) who were monitored for a mean duration of 462.6 ± 39.8 min. Across patients, CBFv deviated by more than 20–30% from its baseline for 17–24% of the analysis time. These CBFv deviations occurred equally during periods of preserved and impaired autoregulation, while concurrent variations in MAP and PetCO 2 explained only 13–21% of these CBFv deviations. Conclusion: CBFv deviations beyond ischemic and hyperemic thresholds are common in critically ill patients with respiratory failure or shock. These deviations occur irrespective of the state of dynamic autoregulation and are not explained by changes in MAP and CO 2 . Future studies should explore mechanisms responsible for these CBFv deviations and establish whether their cumulative burden predicts poor neurocognitive outcomes.
机译:背景:缺血性和血液损伤已成为生物机制,这有助于危重病患者的认知障碍。超越缺血和血液阈值的脑血流动(CBF)的自发偏差可能代表有助于这种脑损伤的侮辱,特别是如果它们随着时间的推移积累并与损伤的自身调节重合。方法:我们使用经颅多普勒测量CBF速度(CBFV)偏离先前报告的缺血性和血液阈值的时间比例,在ICU入院48小时内患有呼吸衰竭和/或休克患者的群体。我们还评估了这些CBFV偏差在动态自身损伤期间是否更常见,以及是否通过平均动脉压(MAP)和终末潮汐PCO 2(PetCO 2)的并发变化来解释它们。结果:我们注册了12名患者(三名女性),被监测为平均持续时间为462.6±39.8分钟。在患者中,CBFV从其基线偏离了20-30%以上的分析时间的17-24%。在保存和受损的自动调节期间,这些CBFV偏差同样发生,而MAP和PETCO 2的并发变化仅解释了这些CBFV偏差的13-21%。结论:呼吸衰竭或休克患者的缺血性和血液阈值之外的CBFV偏差是常见的。这些偏差而不管动态自动调节状态如何,也不会被MAP和CO 2的变化解释。未来的研究应该探讨负责这些CBFV偏差的机制,并确定其累积负担是否预测神经过度成果不佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号