首页> 外文期刊>Geoscientific Model Development Discussions >Evaluation of the offline-coupled GFSv15–FV3–CMAQv5.0.2 in support of the next-generation National Air Quality Forecast Capability over the contiguous United States
【24h】

Evaluation of the offline-coupled GFSv15–FV3–CMAQv5.0.2 in support of the next-generation National Air Quality Forecast Capability over the contiguous United States

机译:对离线耦合GFSV15-FV3-CMAQV5.0.2的评估支持下一代国家空气质量预测能力在连续的美国

获取原文
           

摘要

As a candidate for the next-generation National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NAQFC), the meteorological forecast from the Global Forecast System with the new Finite Volume Cube-Sphere dynamical core (GFS–FV3) will be applied to drive the chemical evolution of gases and particles described by the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system. CMAQv5.0.2, a historical version of CMAQ, has been coupled with the North American Mesoscale Forecast System (NAM) model in the current operational NAQFC. An experimental version of the NAQFC based on the offline-coupled GFS–FV3 version 15 with CMAQv5.0.2 modeling system (GFSv15–CMAQv5.0.2) has been developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to provide real-time air quality forecasts over the contiguous United States (CONUS) since 2018. In this work, comprehensive region-specific, time-specific, and categorical evaluations are conducted for meteorological and chemical forecasts from the offline-coupled GFSv15–CMAQv5.0.2 for the year 2019. The forecast system shows good overall performance in forecasting meteorological variables with the annual mean biases of ? 0.2? ° C for temperature at 2? m , 0.4?% for relative humidity at 2? m , and 0.4? m?s ?1 for wind speed at 10? m compared to the METeorological Aerodrome Reports (METAR) dataset. Larger biases occur in seasonal and monthly mean forecasts, particularly in spring. Although the monthly accumulated precipitation forecasts show generally consistent spatial distributions with those from the remote-sensing and ensemble datasets, moderate-to-large biases exist in hourly precipitation forecasts compared to the Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET) and METAR. While the forecast system performs well in forecasting ozone ( O 3 ) throughout the year and fine particles with a diameter of 2.5? μm or less (PM 2.5 ) for warm months (May–September), it significantly overpredicts annual mean concentrations of PM 2.5 . This is due mainly to the high predicted concentrations of fine fugitive and coarse-mode particle components. Underpredictions in the southeastern US and California during summer are attributed to missing sources and mechanisms of secondary organic aerosol formation from biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semivolatile or intermediate-volatility organic compounds. This work demonstrates the ability of FV3-based GFS in driving the air quality forecasting. It identifies possible underlying causes for systematic region- and time-specific model biases, which will provide a scientific basis for further development of the next-generation NAQFC.
机译:作为下一代国家空气质量预测能力(NAQFC)的候选人,将应用来自全球预测系统的气象预测,采用新的有限体积立方体 - 球体动态核心(GFS-FV3)来推动气体的化学演变和社区多尺度空气质量建模系统描述的粒子。 CMAQV5.0.2是CMAQ的历史版本,已加上当前运营NAQFC中的北美MESCHES预测系统(NAM)模型。基于带有CMAQV5.0.2建模系统的离线耦合GFS-FV3版本15的NAQFC的实验版本(GFSV15-CMAQV5.0.2)是由国家海洋和大气管理(NOAA)开发的,以提供实时空气质量预测自2018年以来的邻近美国(康明斯)。在这项工作中,对2019年离线耦合的GFSV15-CMAQV5.0.2的气象和化学预报进行了全面的地区特定,特定的和分类评估。预测系统在预测与年均偏差的气象变量中显示出良好的整体性能? 0.2?温度为2? M,0.4?%在2时相对湿度? m,和0.4? m?s?1在10时风速速度? M与气象气动组报告(METAR)数据集相比。较大的偏见发生在季节性和每月平均预测中,特别是在春季。尽管每月累计降水预测显示与来自遥感和集合数据集的那些具有一致的空间分布,但与清洁空气状态和趋势网络(FastNet)和METAR相比,每小时降水预测存在中等到大的偏差。虽然预测系统在全年的预测臭氧(O 3)中表现良好,但直径为2.5的细颗粒?温暖月份(5月9月)(5月9月),μm或更短(PM 2.5),它显着估计每年平均PM 2.5的浓度。这主要是由于高预测的细逃逸和粗模式颗粒组分的浓度。夏季东南部和加利福尼亚州的欠款归因于缺少生物挥发性有机化合物(VOC)和半挥发性或中间挥发性有机化合物的二次有机气溶胶形成的缺失的来源和机制。这项工作展示了基于FV3的GFS驱动空气质量预测的能力。它识别有可能的系统区域和时间特定模型偏差的潜在原因,这将为下一代NAQFC进一步发展提供科学依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号