...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition >Challenges of a simplified opt-out consent process in a neonatal randomised controlled trial: qualitative study of parents’ and health professionals’ views and experiences
【24h】

Challenges of a simplified opt-out consent process in a neonatal randomised controlled trial: qualitative study of parents’ and health professionals’ views and experiences

机译:新生儿随机对照试验中简化的选择同意过程的挑战:对父母和卫生专业人员的看法和经验的定性研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background More effective recruitment strategies like alternative approaches to consent are needed to facilitate adequately powered trials. Witholding Enteral feeds Around Transfusion was a multicentre, randomised, pilot trial that compared withholding and continuing feeds around transfusion. The primary clinical outcome was necrotising enterocolitis. The trial used simplified opt-out consent with concise parent information and no consent form. Objective To explore the views and experiences of parents and health professionals on the acceptability and feasibility of opt-out consent in randomised comparative effectiveness trials. Methods A qualitative, descriptive interview-based study nested within a randomised trial. Semistructured interview transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Setting Eleven neonatal units in England. Participants Eleven parents and ten health professionals with experience of simplified consent. Results Five themes emerged: ‘opt-out consent operationalised as verbal opt-in consent’, ‘opt-out consent normalises participation while preserving parental choice’, ‘opt-out consent as an ongoing process of informed choice’, ‘consent without a consent form’ and ‘choosing to opt out of a comparative effectiveness trial’, with two subthemes: ‘wanting “normal care”’ and ‘a belief that feeding is better’. Conclusion Introducing a novel form of consent proved challenging in practice. The principle of a simplified, opt-out approach to consent was generally considered feasible and acceptable by health professionals for a neonatal comparative effectiveness trial. The priority for parents was having the right to decide about trial participation, and they did not see opt-out consent as undermining this. Describing a study as ‘opt-out’ can help to normalise participation and emphasise that parents can withdraw consent.
机译:背景技术需要更有效的招聘策略,如同意的替代方法,以促进充分的动力试验。随着输血周围的肠内饲料是一种多期,随机的试验试验,可将扣留和继续输血饲料进行比较。初级临床结果是坏死性肠结肠炎。该试验使用简化的选择同意,简要介绍了父信息,也不是同意书。目的探讨父母与卫生专业人员对随机比较效果试验中的选择同意的可接受性和可行性的观点和经验。方法在随机试验中嵌套基于定性的基于描述性的采访的研究。使用归纳专题分析分析了半结面试成绩单。在英格兰设定11个新生儿单位。参与者十一父母和十个健康专业人士,具有简化同意的经验。结果出现了五个主题:“退出同意作为口头选择同意”,“退出同意”在保留父母选择的同时,“退出同意作为知情选择”,“未经A的持续进程”。同意形式'和'选择退出比较有效性审判',有两个次节:“想要”正常照顾“和”喂养更好的信念“。结论在实践中介绍了一种新的同意的同意。简化的退出方法同意的原则通常被卫生专业人员对新生儿比较有效性试验的可行性和可接受的。父母的优先事项有权决定试验参与,他们没有看到退出的同意,因为破坏了这一点。将研究描述为“退出”可以帮助正常化参与并强调父母可以撤回同意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号