首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Exploring the impact of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) among orthopaedic surgeons in mainland China: systematic review and survey-based study on hip and knee instruments
【24h】

Exploring the impact of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) among orthopaedic surgeons in mainland China: systematic review and survey-based study on hip and knee instruments

机译:探讨患者报告的矫正外科医生在中国大陆的结果(舞会)的影响:系统审查与髋关节仪器的调查研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are widely used in Europe and North America in a variety of areas including research, clinical governance, clinical registries and insurance ascertainment. The aim of this study was to assess commonly used knee and hip PROMs among Chinese surgeons and to gain an insight into their impact on evaluation of clinical outcomes. 1. A systematic literature search of databases Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and CNKI was performed from the earliest records to 22/07/2020 for knee instruments and 22/08/2020 for hip instruments, to retrieve Chinese Mandarin cross culturally adapted and validated knee and hip PROMs. 2. An 11-item electronic questionnaire was then designed under four domain categories. The survey was distributed via a ubiquitous online social media platform to orthopaedic surgeons. Responses were collected and analyzed. Output from 1. was used to populate parts of the survey questionnaire. The systematic online search yielded a total of 41 evaluation instruments, (10 hip and 31 knee); all of which were incorporated as response options. 234 viable questionnaires were retrieved with the largest group representing attending surgeons. 59.0% were familiar with the concept of PROMs among which 78.4% reported to have used PROMs themselves. In order of frequency of use, PROMs were purposed for clinical assessment (55.6%), research (40.7%), health regulation policies (18.6%) and insurance service requirements (10.6%). Implementation was prompted by both departmental (43.4%) and institutional policy (34.5%). 89.4% of PROMs users reported difficulties in the use of PROMs, with major barriers including license fees, limited access, inadequate training and burden of fill-out time (all ?40%). There is evidence of limited familiarity with knee and hip PROMs among orthopaedic surgeons. Barriers to their use are significant. Development of a Chinese language PROMs database would be helpful.
机译:患者报告的结果措施(PROMS)在欧洲和北美广泛应用于各种领域,包括研究,临床治理,临床登记和保险。本研究的目的是评估中国外科医生的常用膝盖和髋关节竞争,并深入了解他们对对临床结果评估的影响。 1.对数据库的系统文献搜索Medline,Embase,Cinahl和CNKI是从最早的记录到膝关节仪器和22/08/2020的膝关节仪器,以检索中国普通话跨文化改编和验证的膝关节和嘻哈。然后,在四个领域类别下设计了11件电子问卷。该调查通过普遍存在的在线社交媒体平台分发到矫形外科医生。收集并分析了反应。从1.输出用于填充调查问卷的部分。系统在线搜索总共产生41个评估仪器,(10个臀部和31个膝盖);所有这些都被称为响应选项。 234回收了可行的调查问卷,其中最大的集团代表了外科医生。 59.0%熟悉竞争的概念,其中78.4%据报道使用舞会自己。按使用频率的顺序,PROMS被用于临床评估(55.6%),研究(40.7%),卫生监管政策(18.6%)和保险服务要求(10.6%)。部门(43.4%)和机构政策提示实施(34.5%)。 89.4%的PROMS用户报告了使用PROM的困难,具有许可证费用,包括许可费,有限的访问,培训不足和填充时间的负担(全部& 40%)。有证据表明矫形外科医生之间的膝关节和髋关节舞会有限。他们使用的障碍是显着的。汉语舞会数据库的开发将有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号