首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >A data visualisation method for assessing exposure misclassification in case-crossover studies: the example of tricyclic antidepressants and the risk of hip fracture in older people
【24h】

A data visualisation method for assessing exposure misclassification in case-crossover studies: the example of tricyclic antidepressants and the risk of hip fracture in older people

机译:用于评估案例交叉研究中的暴露错误分类的数据可视化方法:三环抗抑郁药的例子和老年人髋部骨折的风险

获取原文
           

摘要

The case-crossover design is suited to medication safety studies but is vulnerable to exposure misclassification. Using the example of tricyclic antidepressants and the risk of hip fracture, we present a data visualisation tool for observing exposure misclassification in case-crossover studies. A case-crossover study was conducted using Australian Government Department of Veterans’ Affairs claims data. Beneficiaries aged over 65?years who were hospitalised for hip fracture between 2009 and 2012 were included. The case window was defined as 1–50?days pre fracture. Control window one and control window two were defined as 101–150 and 151–200?days pre fracture, respectively. Patients were stratified by whether exposure status changed when control window two was specified instead of control window one. To visualise potential misclassification, each subject’s tricyclic antidepressant dispensings were plotted over the 200?days pre fracture. The study population comprised 8828 patients with a median age of 88?years. Of these subjects, 348 contributed data to the analyses with either control window. The data visualisation suggested that 14% of subjects were potentially misclassified with control window one while 45% were misclassified with control window two. The odds ratio for the association between tricyclic antidepressants and hip fracture was 1.18 (95% confidence interval?=?0.91–1.52) using control window one, whereas risk was significantly increased (odds ratio?=?1.43, 95% confidence interval?=?1.11–1.83) using control window two. Exposure misclassification was less likely to be present with control window one than with an earlier control window, control window two. When specifying different control windows in a case-crossover study, data visualisation can help to assess the extent to which exposure misclassification may contribute to variable results.
机译:壳体交叉设计适用于药物安全性研究,但易于暴露错误分类。使用三环抗抑郁药和髋部骨折的风险,我们提出了一种数据可视化工具,用于观察案例交叉研究的暴露错误分类。使用澳大利亚政府的退伍军人事务部门索赔数据进行了一个案例交叉研究。包括超过65岁的受益者在2009年至2012年期间住院的髋部骨折住院。案例窗口定义为1-50天前骨折。控制窗口one和控制窗口分别定义为101-150和151-200?天前骨折。在指定控制窗口两于控制窗口而不是控制窗口中,曝光状态是否改变了患者。为了可视化潜在的错误分类,绘制每个受试者的三环抗抑郁药物分配在200?天前骨折。该研究人口包含8828名患者中位数88岁的患者。在这些主题中,348有助于使用控制窗口的分析进行数据。数据可视化表明,14%的受试者可能会错误地错误分类,而45%被错误分类为控制窗口。三环抗抑郁药和髋部骨折之间关联的差距为1.18(置信区间+Δ= 0.91-1.52),而风险显着增加(赔率比?=?1.43,95%置信区间?= ?1.11-1.83)使用控制窗口。曝光错误分类不太可能与控制窗口的可能性不太可能与前面的控件窗口,控制窗口二。当在壳体交叉研究中指定不同的控制窗口时,数据可视化可以有助于评估曝光错误分类可能导致可变结果的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号