首页> 外文期刊>Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation >Borderline personality disorder (BPD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) revisited – a review-update on common grounds and subtle distinctions
【24h】

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) revisited – a review-update on common grounds and subtle distinctions

机译:边缘性人格障碍(BPD)和注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)重新审查 - 关于共同理由和微妙区别的综述 - 更新

获取原文
           

摘要

Overlap in symptom domains particularly in the field of impulsivity and emotional dysregulation in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) have stimulated further research activities since our last review from 2014. Disentangling features of impulsivity in ADHD and BPD revealed that impulsivity is a feature of both disorders with patients suffering from both ADHD and BPD having highest impulsivity ratings. BPD individuals have more problems using context cues for inhibiting responses and their impulsivity is stress-dependent, whereas ADHD patients have more motor impulsivity and therefore difficulties interrupting ongoing responses. For emotion regulation difficulties the ranking order ranges from ADHD to BPD to the comorbid condition, again with the patients suffering from both, ADHD and BPD, having the most pronounced emotion regulation problems. Environmental influences namely adverse childhood events were shown to be linked to both ADHD and BPD. Traumatic experiences seem independently linked to impulsivity features. Thus, some authors point to the risk of misdiagnosis during childhood and the necessity to screen for traumatic experiences in both patient groups. Genetic research confirmed genetic overlap of BPD with bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenic disorders, as well as genetic overlap of BD and ADHD. A population-based study confirmed the high co-occurrence and familial co-aggregation of ADHD and BPD. Interesting questions in the field of gene-environment-interactions are currently dealt with by genetic and epigenetic research. Few studies have investigated treatment strategies for the comorbid condition, though the issue is highly important for the management of patients suffering from both disorders and presenting with the highest symptom scores. Research on the different impulsivity features might point to a necessity of disorder-specific treatment strategies in the field of impulse control. Future research is needed to base treatment decisions for the comorbid condition on an evidence basis.
机译:症状域中的重叠域特别是在冲动和情绪中,注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和边界人格障碍(BPD)以来,自2014年的最后一篇审查以来刺激了进一步的研究活动。在adhd和BPD冲动的疏忽特征揭示了冲动是两种疾病的特征,患有患有具有最高冲击性的ADHD和BPD的患者。 BPD个人使用上下文提示对抑制反应的影响有更多的问题,并且它们的冲动依赖性依赖性,而ADHD患者具有更多的电机冲动,因此难以中断持续反应的困难。对于情感调节困难,排名顺序从ADHD到BPD到合并症的情况,再次随着患有患者,ADHD和BPD,具有最明显的情绪调节问题。环境影响即不良儿童事件显示与ADHD和BPD均相关。创伤体验似乎与冲动的特征独立相关。因此,一些作者指出了儿童误诊的风险,以及患者群体中的创伤体验筛选的必要性。遗传研究证实了BPD与双相障碍(BD)和精神分裂症紊乱的遗传重叠,以及BD和ADHD的遗传重叠。基于人群的研究证实了ADHD和BPD的高共存和家族性共聚。目前通过遗传和表观遗传研究处理基因环境相互作用领域的有趣问题。少数研究对可融合病症进行了调查的治疗策略,尽管问题对于管理患有两种疾病的患者并呈现出最高症状分数非常重要。对不同冲动性的研究可能指出脉冲控制领域的特定紊乱特异性治疗策略的必要性。未来的研究是在证据基础上基于合并条件的治疗决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号