首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Effects of hospital funding reform on wait times for hip fracture surgery: a population-based interrupted time-series analysis
【24h】

Effects of hospital funding reform on wait times for hip fracture surgery: a population-based interrupted time-series analysis

机译:医院资金改革对髋关节骨折手术等待时间的影响:一种基于人口的中断时间序列分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Health care funding reforms are being used worldwide to improve system performance but may invoke unintended consequences. We assessed the effects of introducing a targeted hospital funding model, based on fixed price and volume, for hip fractures. We hypothesized the policy change was associated with reduction in wait times for hip fracture surgery, increase in wait times for non-hip fracture surgery, and increase in the incidence of after-hours hip fracture surgery. This was a population-based, interrupted time series analysis of 49,097 surgeries for hip fractures, 10,474 for ankle fractures, 1,594 for tibial plateau fractures, and 40,898 for appendectomy at all hospitals in Ontario, Canada between April 2012 and March 2017. We used segmented regression analysis of interrupted monthly time series data to evaluate the impact of funding reform enacted April 1, 2014 on wait time for hip fracture repair (from hospital presentation to surgery) and after-hours provision of surgery (occurring between 1700 and 0700?h). To assess potential adverse consequences of the reform, we also evaluated two control procedures, ankle and tibial plateau fracture surgery. Appendectomy served as a non-orthopedic tracer for assessment of secular trends. The difference (95?% confidence interval) between the actual mean wait time and the predicted rate had the policy change not occurred was ??0.46?h (-3.94?h, 3.03?h) for hip fractures, 1.46?h (-3.58?h, 6.50?h) for ankle fractures, -3.22?h (-39.39?h, 32.95?h) for tibial plateau fractures, and 0.33?h (-0.57?h, 1.24?h) for appendectomy (Figure 1; Table?3). The difference (95?% confidence interval) between the actual and predicted percentage of surgeries performed after-hours ??0.90?% (-3.91?%, 2.11?%) for hip fractures, -3.54?% (-11.25?%, 4.16?%) for ankle fractures, 7.09?% (-7.97?%, 22.14?%) for tibial plateau fractures, and 1.07?% (-2.45?%, 4.59?%) for appendectomy. We found no significant effects of a targeted hospital funding model based on fixed price and volume on wait times or the provision of after-hours surgery. Other approaches for improving hip fracture wait times may be worth pursuing instead of funding reform.
机译:全世界正在使用卫生保健资助改革,以提高系统性能,但可能会调查意外后果。我们评估了基于固定价格和体积引入目标医院资助模式的影响,用于髋部骨折。我们假设政策变化与髋关节骨折手术的等待时间减少有关,不髋关节骨折手术的等待时间增加,以及产后髋关节骨折手术的发生率。这是一个基于人口的中断时间序列分析,为49,097份髋部骨折,10,474个用于踝关节骨折,1,594名胫骨平台骨折,以及在2012年4月至2017年4月之间的安大略省所有医院的40,898名阑尾切除术。我们使用分段中断月度时间序列数据的回归分析评估资金改革的影响2014年4月1日在等候时间对臀部骨折修复(从医院介绍到手术)和余下的手术提供(在1700到0700?H之间发生) 。为了评估改革的潜在不利后果,我们还评估了两种控制程序,脚踝和胫骨平台骨折手术。阑尾切除术作为非矫形示踪剂,用于评估世俗趋势。实际平均等待时间和预测率之间的差异(95?%置信区间)未发生政策变化是髋部骨折的0.46?H(-3.94℃,3.03·H),1.46?H( - 3.58?H,6.50?H)用于踝关节骨折,-3.22℃(-39.39℃,32.95μl)用于胫骨平台骨折,阑尾切除术的0.33?h(-0.57μl,1.24Ωh)(图1 ; 表3)。在臀部骨折后的时间后的实际和预测百分比的实际和预测百分比之间的差异(95?%置信区间)在后的时间(-3.91℃,2.11μl≤21.11%),-3.54℃(-11.25℃, 4.16?%)对于脚踝骨折,7.09?%(-7.97μm,22.14%)用于胫骨平台骨折,对阑尾切除术的1.07?%(-2.45μl.%)。我们发现基于固定价格和等待时间的固定价格和数量或提供后的手术的批量没有显着影响。改善髋部骨折等待时间的其他方法可能值得追求而不是资金改革。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号