首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pulmonary Medicine >Prone during pandemic: development and implementation of a quality-based protocol for proning severe COVID-19 hypoxic lung failure patients in situationally or historically low resource hospitals
【24h】

Prone during pandemic: development and implementation of a quality-based protocol for proning severe COVID-19 hypoxic lung failure patients in situationally or historically low resource hospitals

机译:在大流行期间易于:在情境或历史上低资源医院在阳性或历史低管医院映射严重的Covid-19缺氧肺部失效患者的质量为基础的协议

获取原文
       

摘要

Intermittent Prone Positioning (IPP) for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) decreases mortality. We present a program for IPP using expedient materials for settings of significant limitations in both overwhelmed established ICUs and particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) treating ARDS due to COVID-19 caused by SARS CoV-2. The proning program evolved based on the principles of High Reliability Organizations (HROs) and Crew Resource Management (CRM). Patients with severe ARDS [PaO2:FiO2 ratio (PFr)?≤?150 on FiO2?≥?0.6 and PEEP?≥?5?cm H2O] received IPP. Patients were placed prone 16?h each day. When PFr was ≥?200 for ?8?h supine IPP ceased. IPP used available materials without requiring additional work from the bedside team. Changes in PFr, PaCO2, and the SaO2:FiO2 ratio (SaFr) positionally were evaluated using t-statistics and ANOVA with Bonferroni correction (p??0.017). Between 14APR2020 and 09MAY2020, at the peak of deaths in New York, there were 202 IPPs in 29 patients. Patients were 58.5?±?1.7?years of age (37, 73), 76% male and had a body mass index (BMI) of 27.8?±?0.8 (21, 38). Pressor agents were used in 76% and 17% received dialysis. The PFr prior to IPP was 107.5?±?5.6 and 1?h after IPP was 155.7?±?11.2 (p??0.001 compared to pre-prone). PFr after the patients were placed supine was 131.5?±?9.1 (p?=?0.02). Pre-prone PaCO2 was 60.0?±?2.5 and the 1-h post-prone PaCO2 was 67.2?±?3.1 (p?=?0.02). Supine PaCO2 after IPP was 60.4?±?3.4 (p?=?0.90). The SaFr prior to IPP was 121.3?±?4.2 and the SaFr 1?h after positioning was 131.5?±?5.1 (p?=?0.03). The post-IPP supine SaFr was 139.7?±?5.9 (p??0.001). With ANOVA and Bonferroni correction there were statistically significant changes in PFr (p??0.001) and SaFr (p??0.001) and no significant changes in PaCO2 over the four time points measured. Using regression coefficients, the SaFrs predicted by PFrs of 150 and 200 at baseline are 133.2 and 147.3, respectively. An IPP program for patients with COVID-19 ARDS can be instituted rapidly, safely, and effectively during an overwhelming mass casualty scenario. This approach may be equally applicable in both traditionally austere environments in LMICs and in otherwise capable centers facing situational resource limitations.
机译:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的间歇性易于定位(IPP)降低了死亡率。我们为IPP提供了IPP的计划,用于在淹没所建立的ICU中的显着限制,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)上处理ARDS引起的SARS COV-2引起的。基于高可靠性组织(HROS)和船员资源管理(CRM)的原理,发作的映射。严重ARDS的患者[PAO2:FIO2比率(PFR)吗?≤α150在FiO2上?≥?0.6和PEEP?≥?5?CM H2O]接受了IPP。患者每天都倾向于16?小时。当PFR≥?200对于& 8?H仰卧IPP停止。 IPP使用可用材料,而无需从床头队中携带额外的工作。使用T统计和Anova具有Bonferroni校正,评估PFR,PACO2和SAO2:FiO2比率(SAFR)的变化(P?<0.017)。在14APR2020和09May2020之间,在纽约的死亡峰值,29名患者中有202个IPP。患者是58.5?±1.7岁(37,73岁),76%雄性,体重指数(BMI)为27.8?±0.8(21,38)。压力机用于76%和17%接受透析。 IPP之前的PFR为107.5?±5.6和1?H在IPP之后为155.7?±11.2(P = 0.001与PRONE PRONE)。将患者被置位后的PFR是131.5?±9.1(p?= 0.02)。 Pre-Paco2为60.0?±2.5​​和1-H后1-H后67.2?±3.1(p?= 0.02)。 IPP之后仰卧PACO2为60.4?±3.4(p?= 0.90)。在IPP之前的SAFR为121.3?±4.2和定位后的SAFR 1?H为131.5?±5.1(P?= 0.03)。后IPP仰卧SAFR为139.7?±5.9(p≤≤0.001)。随着ANOVA和Bonferroni校正,PFR(p≤≤0.001)和SAFR(p≤≤0.001)的统计学上显着变化,并且在测量的四个时间点上没有PACO2的显着变化。使用回归系数,在基线150和200的PFR预测的SAFR分别为133.2和147.3。 Covid-19 ARDS患者的IPP计划可以在压倒性的大规模伤亡场景中快速,安全,有效地提起提高。这种方法可以同样适用于LMIC中的传统AUSTERE环境,并在否则有能力面临的情境资源限制的中心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号