首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pulmonary Medicine >Diagnostic performance of D-dimer in predicting pulmonary embolism in tuberculous pleural effusion patients
【24h】

Diagnostic performance of D-dimer in predicting pulmonary embolism in tuberculous pleural effusion patients

机译:D-二聚体在结核胸腔积液患者中预测肺栓塞中的诊断性能

获取原文
           

摘要

Tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) patients usually have elevated D-dimer levels. The diagnostic performance of D-dimer in predicting pulmonary embolism (PE) in the TPE population is unclear. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of D-dimer for PE in the TPE population and explore its potential mechanism. We retrospectively analysed patients who were admitted to Xinhua Hospital and Weifang Respiratory Disease Hospital with confirmed TPE between March 2014 and January 2020. D-dimer levels were compared between patients with and without PE. To test the diagnostic performance of D-dimer in predicting PE, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were also reported. To explore the potential mechanism of PE in TPE, inflammatory biomarkers were compared between PE and non-PE patients. This study included 248 patients (170 males and 78 females) aged 43?±?20.6?years. Elevated D-dimer levels (≥?0.5?mg/L) were detected in 186/248 (75%) patients. Of the 150 patients who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography, 29 were diagnosed with PE. Among the TPE population, the PE patients had significantly higher D-dimer levels than the non-PE patients (median, 1.06?mg/L vs. 0.84?mg/L, P??0.05). The optimal cut-off value for D-dimer in predicting PE in TPE was 1.18?mg/L, with a sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 77.8% (area under curve, 0.893; 95% confidence interval 0.839–0.947; P??0.01). The PPV was 49.1%, while the NPV was 96.9% at a D-dimer cut-off of 1.18?mg/L for PE. PE patients had lower median WBC and interleukin (IL)-8 values (5.14?×?109/L vs. 6.1?×?109/L, P??0.05; 30.2?pg/ml vs. 89.7?pg/ml, P??0.05) but a higher median IL-2 receptor value (1964.8?pg/ml vs. 961.2?pg/ml, P??0.01) than those in the non-PE patients. D-dimer is an objective biomarker for predicting PE in patients with TPE. A D-dimer cut-off of 1.18?mg/L in the TPE population may reduce unnecessary radiological tests due to its excellent sensitivity, specificity, and NPV for PE. The imbalance of prothrombotic and antithrombotic cytokines may partly be attributed to the formation of pulmonary emboli in patients with TPE.
机译:结核性胸膜积液(TPE)患者通常具有升高的D-二聚体水平。 D-二聚体在预测TPE人群中预测肺栓塞(PE)的诊断性能尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估D二聚体在TPE人口中PE的诊断性能,并探讨其潜在机制。我们回顾性地分析了2014年3月至1月20日至1月20日至1月20日期间在新华医院和潍坊呼吸系统医院接受的患者。在没有PE的患者之间比较D-二聚体水平。为了测试D-Dimer在预测PE中的诊断性能,执行接收器操作特征曲线分析。还报道了阳性预测值(PPV)和负预测值(NPV)。为了探讨PE在TPE中的潜在机制,比较PE和非PE患者的炎症生物标志物。本研究包括248名患者(170名男性和78名女性)43岁?±20.6?年。在186/248名(75%)患者中检测到升高的D-二聚体水平(≥1.0.5μg/ L)。在接受计算机断层扫描肺血管造影的150名患者中,用PE诊断出29例。在TPE群体中,PE患者的D-二聚体水平明显高于非PE患者(中位数,1.06×mg / L与0.84×mg / L,p≤≤0.05)。在TPE中预测PE的D-二聚体的最佳截止值为1.18?Mg / L,灵敏度为89.7%,特异性为77.8%(曲线下面积为0.893; 95%置信区间0.839-0.947; p & 0.01)。 PPV为49.1%,而NPV为PE的D-二聚体切断的NPV为96.9%。 PE患者中位数WBC和白细胞介素(IL)-8值(5.14?×109 / L,6.1?0.05; 30.2〜30.2〜0.3×PG / ml,p?0.05),但较高中值IL-2受体值(1964.8〜pg / ml与961.2〜pg / ml,p≤≤0.01),而不是非PE患者中的那些。 D-二聚体是用于预测TPE患者的PE的客观生物标志物。 TPE群体中的D-二聚体截止为1.18?Mg / L可能会导致其优异的敏感性,特异性和NPV来减少不必要的放射性测试。 prothrombisc和抗血栓性细胞因子的不平衡可能部分地归因于TPE患者的肺部栓塞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号