首页> 外文期刊>BMC Emergency Medicine >Why do healthcare professionals fail to escalate as per the early warning system (EWS) protocol? A qualitative evidence synthesis of the barriers and facilitators of escalation
【24h】

Why do healthcare professionals fail to escalate as per the early warning system (EWS) protocol? A qualitative evidence synthesis of the barriers and facilitators of escalation

机译:为什么医疗保健专业人员因预警系统(EWS)议定书而未能升级? 促销障碍和促进者的定性证据综合

获取原文
           

摘要

Early warning systems (EWSs) are used to assist clinical judgment in the detection of acute deterioration to avoid or reduce adverse events including unanticipated cardiopulmonary arrest, admission to the intensive care unit and death. Sometimes healthcare professionals (HCPs) do not trigger the alarm and escalate for help according to the EWS protocol and it is unclear why this is the case. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis was to answer the question ‘why do HCPs fail to escalate care according to EWS protocols?’ The findings will inform the update of the National Clinical Effectiveness Committee (NCEC) National Clinical Guideline No. 1 Irish National Early Warning System (INEWS). A systematic search of the published and grey literature was conducted (until February 2018). Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted by two reviewers independently using standardised data extraction forms and quality appraisal tools. A thematic synthesis was conducted by two reviewers of the qualitative studies included and categorised into the barriers and facilitators of escalation. GRADE CERQual was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. Eighteen studies incorporating a variety of HCPs across seven countries were included. The barriers and facilitators to the escalation of care according to EWS protocols were developed into five overarching themes: Governance, Rapid Response Team (RRT) Response, Professional Boundaries, Clinical Experience, and EWS parameters. Barriers to escalation included: Lack of Standardisation, Resources, Lack of accountability, RRT behaviours, Fear, Hierarchy, Increased Conflict, Over confidence, Lack of confidence, and Patient variability. Facilitators included: Accountability, Standardisation, Resources, RRT behaviours, Expertise, Additional support, License to escalate, Bridge across boundaries, Clinical confidence, empowerment, Clinical judgment, and a tool for detecting deterioration. These are all individual yet inter-related barriers and facilitators to escalation. The findings of this qualitative evidence synthesis provide insight into the real world experience of HCPs when using EWSs. This in turn has the potential to inform policy-makers and HCPs as well as hospital management about emergency response system-related issues in practice and the changes needed to address barriers and facilitators and improve patient safety and quality of care.
机译:预警系统(EWSS)用于帮助临床判断检测急性恶化,以避免或减少不良事件,包括意外的心肺逮捕,包括重症监护单位和死亡。有时医疗保健专业人员(HCPS)不会触发警报并根据EWS协议升级帮助,并不清楚为什么这是如此。这种定性证据综合的目的是回答这个问题“为什么惠普根据EWS议定书就会升级保健?”调查结果将以最新情况通知国家临床效益委员会(NCEC)国家临床指南1号IRISH全国临床指南警告系统(Inews)。对发表和灰色文献进行了系统搜索(直到2018年2月)。数据提取和质量评估由两位审阅者独立使用标准化数据提取形式和质量评估工具进行。主题综合由两个定性研究的审查员进行,并分为升级障碍和促进者。等级Carqual用于评估证据的确定性。包括跨越七个国家的各种HCP的十八研究。根据EWS议定书的障碍和促进者升级为促进护理议定书,以五个总体主题制定为:治理,快速反应团队(RRT)响应,专业界限,临床经验和EWS参数。升级的障碍包括:缺乏标准化,资源,缺乏问责制,恐惧行为,恐惧,等级,增加冲突,超自行,缺乏信心和患者的可变性。促进者包括:问责制,标准化,资源,RRT行为,专业知识,额外支持,升级,跨越边界的桥梁,临床信心,赋权,临床判断,以及用于检测恶化的工具。这些都是个人尚未与间的障碍和促进者升级。这种定性证据综合的调查结果在使用EWSS时提供了对HCP的真实世界经验的洞察力。这反过来又有可能会通知政策制定者和HCP,以及关于实践中应急响应系统相关问题的医院管理以及解决障碍和促进者所需的变化,提高患者安全和护理质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号