首页> 外文期刊>BMC Oral Health >Propylene mesh versus acrylic resin stent for palatal wound protection following free gingival graft harvesting: a short-term pilot randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Propylene mesh versus acrylic resin stent for palatal wound protection following free gingival graft harvesting: a short-term pilot randomized clinical trial

机译:自由牙龈移植收割后,丙烯网对腭伤壁支架进行丙烯酸树脂支架:短期试验随机临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Protection of the palatal wound is an essential step following harvesting a palatal soft tissue graft. The aim of the current pilot randomized clinical study was to assess the efficacy of using propylene mesh as protective sheet when compared to conventional custom made acrylic stent after harvesting a palatal graft. The primary outcome of this study was bleeding postoperatively and secondary outcomes were pain, healing profile of the donor site as well as patient satisfaction. Between 2018 and 2019 we conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of 24 patients with palatal defects. Two groups of 12 patients with 24 sites were included in this study and were treated with soft tissue grafting technique using free grafts harvested from the hard palate. The palatal wounds were protected with propylene mesh (test group) or custom-made acrylic palatal stent (control group). Participants were assessed for the amount and duration of bleeding, pain duration, and the risk of infection 2, 4, 6, 8, 14?days post-operatively. The trial had been registered in clinical trials.gov (NCT04348279). Four sites were excluded from the study as dropouts. The polypropylene mesh was more effective at reducing bleeding by (2.4?±?1.075) and pain by (1.600?±?0.516), while the custom-made acrylic stent reduced the bleeding (5.8?±?1.22) and pain (7.100?±?0.316). The decline in amount of bleeding amount (P value?=?0.021) and its duration (P value?=?0.001) achieved by the propylene mesh was statistically significant. There was no statistical significant difference in patient satisfaction and the duration of healing process between the 2 groups. However, the healing profile of the test group was statistically significant when compared with the control group (P value?=?0.002). Propylene mesh is a promising material for protection of the palatal wound due to its light weight, limited bacterial wicking, tissue compatibility. Further studies are required to adequally assess the benefits of this material in periodontal plastic surgeries.
机译:保护腭伤害是收获腭软组织移植物后的重要步骤。目前试点随机临床研究的目的是评估使用丙烯网作为保护片的疗效与常规定制的丙烯酸支架相比收获腭移植物。本研究的主要结果术后和次要结果渗出,供体部位的疼痛,治愈曲线以及患者满意度。 2018年至2019年间,我们进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,对腭缺损24名患者进行了一项预期的随机对照试验。这项研究中包含两组12名患有24位点的患者,并使用从硬腭收获的游离移植物用软组织接枝技术进行处理。用丙烯网(试验组)或定制的丙烯酸类腭支架(对照组)保护腭伤。参与者评估出血,疼痛持续时间和感染风险2,4,6,8,14?天的持续时间和持续时间。该试验已在临床试验中注册.GOV(NCT04348279)。作为辍学的研究被排除了四个地点。聚丙烯网更有效地通过(2.4≤x≤1.075)和疼痛(1.600?±0.516),而定制的丙烯酸支架减少了出血(5.8?±1.22)和疼痛(7.100? ±0.316)。通过丙烯网实现的出血量(P值Δ= 0.021)的下降(P值?= 0.021)及其持续时间(P值Δ= 0.001)是统计学意义的。患者满意度没有统计学显着差异和2组之间的愈合过程的持续时间。然而,与对照组相比(P值Δ= 0.002)相比,试验组的愈合曲线统计学意义。丙烯网是一种有希望的材料,用于保护腭伤,由于其重量轻,有限的细菌芯吸,组织相容性。需要进一步的研究来充分评估这种材料在牙周塑料手术中的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号