...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Gender differences in the effect of self-rated health (SRH) on all-cause mortality and specific causes of mortality among individuals aged 50 years and older
【24h】

Gender differences in the effect of self-rated health (SRH) on all-cause mortality and specific causes of mortality among individuals aged 50 years and older

机译:自我评价的健康(SRH)对50岁及以上的个人死亡率和特定死亡原因的性别差异

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Although different gender associations between self-rated health (SRH) and mortality have been reported, the results of the respective studies have been inconsistent and little is known about the cause-specific relation of mortality with SRH by gender. Therefore, to evaluate the gender differences in all-cause or specific causes of mortality by SRH, this retrospective cohort study was conducted using the data of 19,770 Korean adults aged 50 years and over who underwent health screening at Seoul National University Hospital between March 1995 and December 2008. SRH was surveyed using a simple questionnaire, and the all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality were followed up from baseline screening until December 31, 2016. Results showed that the relationship between SRH and all-cause mortality differed by gender, and the differences also varied depending on the cause of death. In men, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of all-cause mortality was higher in the poor SRH group than the very good SRH groups even after adjustment for socio-demographic, clinical, and behavioral risk factors (aHR:1.97, 95% CI 1.51–2.56), and these results were similar to those for cancer, cardiovascular, and respiratory disease mortalities (aHR:1.52, 95% CI 0.93–2.50; aHR: 2.11, 95% CI 1.19–3.74; aHR:10.30, 95% CI 2.39–44.44, respectively). However, in women, the association between SRH and all-cause mortality was insignificant, and inverse relationships were found for cardiovascular and respiratory disease mortalities in the poor and very good SRH groups. Cancer mortality had a positive relation with SRH (aHR: 1.14, 95% CI 0.75–1.72; aHR: 2.58, 95% CI 1.03–6.48; aHR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.24–0.98; aHR: 0.15, 95% CI 0.04–0.57: all-cause, cancer, cardiovascular, and respiratory disease mortalities, respectively). Clinicians need to take these gender differences by SRH into account when evaluating the health status of over-middle aged adults.
机译:虽然报告了自我评价的健康(SRH)和死亡率之间的不同性别协会,但各自研究的结果一直不一致,众所周知,对性别康复的死亡率与死亡率的具体关系有关。因此,为了评估SRH对所有原因或特定原因的性别差异,通过1995年3月在1995年3月在首尔国立大学医院接受了50岁及以上的韩国成年人的数据进行了19,770名韩国成年人的数据进行了对其的性别差异。 2008年12月。SRH使用简单的调查问卷调查,并从基线筛查到2016年12月31日,所有原因死亡率和原因特异性死亡率。结果表明,SRH与全因死亡率之间的关系,而且差异也取决于死因的原因。在男性中,即使在对社会人口统计,临床和行为危险因素调整后,差的SRH组的调整后死亡率的危险比(AHR)也比良好的SRH群体更高(AHR:1.97,95%CI 1.51-2.56),这些结果与癌症,心血管和呼吸系统疾病死亡人员相似(AHR:1.52,95%CI 0.93-2.50; AHR:2.11,95%CI 1.19-3.74; AHR:10.30,95% CI 2.39-44.44分别)。然而,在女性中,SRH和全因死亡率之间的关联是微不足道的,并且发现穷人和非常好的SRH群体心血管和呼吸道疾病的逆关系。癌症死亡率与SRH有阳性关系(AHR:1.14,95%CI 0.75-1.72; AHR:2.58,95%CI 1.03-6.48; AHR:0.49,95%CI 0.24-0.98; AHR:0.15,95%CI 0.04 -0.57:分别的全因,癌症,心血管和呼吸道疾病。临床医生需要在评估中间人成年人的健康状况时考虑到SRH的这些性别差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号