首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Affective and enjoyment responses to 12 weeks of high intensity interval training and moderate continuous training in adults with Crohn’s disease
【24h】

Affective and enjoyment responses to 12 weeks of high intensity interval training and moderate continuous training in adults with Crohn’s disease

机译:情感和享受反应对12周的高强度间隔训练和中度连续培训的成年人与克罗恩病

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim was to undertake secondary data analysis from a three-arm randomised feasibility trial of high intensity interval training (HIIT), moderate intensity continuous training (MICT), and usual care control in adults with Crohn’s disease (CD; n = 36), with a primary focus on exploring affective and enjoyment responses. Twenty-five participants with quiescent or mildly-active CD were randomised to one of the two exercise groups: HIIT (n = 13) and MICT (n = 12). Both groups were offered thrice weekly sessions for 12 weeks. MICT consisted of cycling for 30 minutes at 35% peak power (Wpeak), whereas HIIT involved ten 1-minute bouts at 90% Wpeak, interspersed with 1-minute bouts at 15% Wpeak. Heart rate (HR), differentiated ratings of perceived exertion for legs (RPE-L) and central (RPE-C), along with feeling state (Feeling Scale; FS) were measured at 92.5% of each session. Enjoyment was measured at the end of training using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES). Post-hoc exploratory analysis involved a mixed-model two-way ANOVA to compare HR, RPE-L, RPE-C and FS for the exercise sessions in weeks 1, 6 and 12 between groups. Overall, HR was greater ( p 0.01) during HIIT (173 ± 8 bpm) compared with MICT (128 ± 6 bpm). Similarly, RPE-L and RPE-C responses were greater overall ( p = 0.03 and p = 0.03, respectively) during HIIT (5.5 ± 1.6 and 5.1 ± 1.7, respectively) compared to MICT (3.3 ± 1.5 and 2.9 ± 1.5, respectively). Overall, FS was 2.2 ± 1.9 for HIIT and 2.1 ± 1.4 for MICT with no effect of treatment group ( p = 0.25) or time ( p = 0.94). There was also no significant difference in PACES scores between HIIT (99.4 ± 12.9) and MICT (101.3 ± 17.4; p = 0.78). The findings suggest HIIT and MICT protocols elicited similar enjoyment and affect in adults with quiescent or mildly-active CD.
机译:目的是从高强度间隔训练(HIIT),中等强度连续训练(MICT)的三臂随机可行性试验中进行二次数据分析,以及克罗恩病的成年人的常规护理控制(CD; n = 36),主要关注探索情感和享受反应。将静态或轻微活性CD的二十五个参与者随机化为两种运动组中的一种:HIIT(n = 13)和MICT(n = 12)。两组两组每周都提供12周。 MICT由循环30分钟,以35%的峰值功率(WPEAK)组成,而HIIT涉及90%WPEAK的10分钟,散布于15%WPPEAK的1分钟的比赛。心率(HR),腿部(RPE-L)和中央(RPE-C)的差异化评级以及感觉状态(感觉规模; FS)测量为每次会议的92.5%。使用物理活动享受量表(步伐)在培训结束时衡量享受。后HOC探索性分析涉及混合模型双向ANOVA,用于比较组1,6和12之间的运动课程的HR,RPE-L,RPE-C和FS。总体而言,与MICT(128±6bpm)相比,HIT(173±8bpm)的HR更大(P <0.01)。类似地,与MICT(3.3±1.5和2.9±1.5分别为PIIT(分别为5.5±1.6和5.1±1.7),RPE-1和RPE-C响应分别更大(分别为5.5±1.6和5.1±1.7)更大(P = 0.03和P = 0.03) )。总体而言,FS为2.2±1.9的HIIT和2.1±1.4,用于治疗组的影响(P = 0.25)或时间(P = 0.94)。 HIIT之间的比分分数也没有显着差异(99.4±12.9)和MICT(101.3±17.4; p = 0.78)。调查结果表明HIIT和MICT协议引发了类似的享受,并影响成年人的静态或轻度活跃的CD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号