...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >The Evolution of Prosocial and Antisocial Competitive Behavior and the Emergence of Prosocial and Antisocial Leadership Styles
【24h】

The Evolution of Prosocial and Antisocial Competitive Behavior and the Emergence of Prosocial and Antisocial Leadership Styles

机译:女性和反社会竞争行为的演变与女性和反社会领导风格的出现

获取原文
           

摘要

Evolutionary analysis focuses on how genes build organisms with different strategies for engaging and solving life’s challenges of survival and reproduction. One of those challenges is competing with conspecifics for limited resources including reproductive opportunities. This article suggests that there is now good evidence for considering two dimensions of social competition. The first, has been labeled as antisocial strategies, to the extent that they tend to be self-focused, threat sensitive and aggressive, and use tactics of bulling, threatening, and intimidating subordinates, or even injuring/killing competitors. Such strategies can inhibit care and affiliative social interactions and motivation. The social signals emitted stimulate threat processing in recipients and can create stressed and highly stratified groups with a range of detrimental psychological and physiological effects. Second, in contrast, prosocial strategies seek to create relaxed and secure social interactions that enable sharing, cooperative, mutually supportive and beneficial relationships. The friendly and low/no threat social signals emitted in friendly cooperative and affiliative relationships stimulate physiological systems (e.g., oxytocin, the vagus nerve of the parasympathetic system) that downregulates threat processing, enhances the immune system, and facilitates frontal cortical processes and general wellbeing. This article reviews the literature pertaining to the evidence for these two dimensions of social engagement.
机译:进化分析侧重于基因如何构建具有不同策略的生物,以便参与和解决生存和繁殖的挑战。其中一个挑战正在与包括生殖机会的有限资源有限的挑战竞争。本文表明,现在考虑两个社会竞争方面的良好证据。首先,已被标记为反社会策略,在某种程度上,他们倾向于是自我关注的,威胁敏感和侵略性,以及利用欺凌,威胁和恐吓下属的策略,甚至受伤/杀害竞争对手。此类策略可以抑制护理和隶属度的社会互动和动机。社会信号发出刺激受体中的威胁加工,可以创造压力和高度分层的群体,具有一系列不利的心理和生理效果。其次,相比之下,口语策略寻求创造轻松和安全的社交互动,使共享,合作,相互支持和有益的关系。友好和低/无威胁社交信号在友好的合作和隶属关系中发出刺激生理系统(例如,催产素,副气神经系统的迷宫神经),其下调威胁加工,增强免疫系统,并促进正面皮质过程和通用福祉。本文审查了与社会参与的这两个维度的证据有关的文献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号