首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: JABFM >When and How Do We Need Permission to Help Patients Address Social Risk?
【24h】

When and How Do We Need Permission to Help Patients Address Social Risk?

机译:我们需要如何以及如何以及如何帮助患者满足社会风险?

获取原文
       

摘要

Amid mounting evidence that health care services have a relatively small impact on health outcomes, which is dwarfed by the influences of a patient’s social context, many health care institutions are clamoring to learn more about their patients’ social risks. Increasing numbers of clinics, hospitals, and emergency departments are now administering social risk screening questionnaires or asking about the social, economic, and behavioral risk factors of their patients in other ways.1,2 In their commentary in this issue, De Marchis et al (2020) describe the rapid proliferation of these efforts, supported by national recommendations from esteemed organizations, such as the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine, to continue doing so.1,3 These efforts are being undertaken to more clearly identify subsets of vulnerable patients who have social risk factors that can be addressed by health care providers through various means (eg, referrals to social service agencies, increased intensity of care management services, embedding behavioral health providers into clinics and hospitals, food pantries, enhanced child care, and transportation offerings). In turn, these interventions to address patients’ heightened social risks might result in shorter hospital stays, less frequent emergency department visits, reductions in preventable readmissions, and improved overall health of patient populations for which a system is accountable (and for whom the system is likely assuming some financial risk). De Marchis et al (2020) shine a spotlight on an interesting paradox that is emerging in this flurry of activity: although patients are often willing to report social risks to their health care providers, many patients do not want help in addressing them.
机译:在安装证据时,卫生保健服务对健康成果产生相对较小的影响,这是患者社会背景的影响,许多医疗机构都克服了更多关于患者的社会风险的更多信息。越来越多的诊所,医院和急诊部门现在正在管理社会风险筛查问卷或询问其患者的社会,经济和行为危险因素,以其他方式在此问题中的评论中,de Marchis等(2020)描述了这些努力的快速扩散,由尊敬的组织的国家建议支持,例如国家科学,工程和医学的国家学院,继续执行SO.1,3这些努力更加清楚地识别子集具有社会危险因素的弱势患者,可以通过各种手段(例如,社会服务机构的推荐,增加护理管理服务强度,将行为卫生提供者嵌入诊所和医院,食品储备,加强的儿童保育,和运输产品)。反过来,这些干预措施来解决患者的社会风险可能导致住院时间较短,迫切频繁的急诊部门访问,可预防的入伍减少,以及改善系统是负责任的患者人口的整体健康状况(以及系统所在的患者人口可能存在一些财务风险)。 de Marchis等人(2020)在这种活动中出现的一个有趣的悖论闪耀着一个挑剔的悖论:尽管患者往往愿意向其医疗保健提供者报告社会风险,但许多患者不希望帮助解决它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号