首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sports Science and Medicine >Concurrent and Construct Validation of a New Scale for Rating Perceived Exertion during Elastic Resistance Training in The Elderly
【24h】

Concurrent and Construct Validation of a New Scale for Rating Perceived Exertion during Elastic Resistance Training in The Elderly

机译:并发和构建新规模的验证,以便在老年人弹性抗性训练期间感知施用

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose of the study was to examine the concurrent and construct validity of a new perceptual scale to control the exercise intensity using elastic bands (Resistance Intensity Scale for Exercise; RISE) in the elderly. Twenty-six participants underwent two sessions consisting of 4 exercises. The participants performed three sets of 15 repetitions per exercise of either low, medium, or high intensity. The criterion variables were heart rate and applied force (mean and peak). Following the final repetition of each set, active muscle (AM) and overall body (OB) ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected from RISE and the OMNI-Resistance Exercise Scale of perceived exertion with elastic bands (OMNI-RES EB). Construct validity was established by correlating the perceptual score obtained from both scales, RISE and OMNI-RES EB. Significant ( p ≤ 0.05) and positive linear relationships between both scales were found (RPE-AM R ~(2) = 0.90; RPE-OB R ~(2) = 0.77). Significant differences in heart rate, applied force, and RISE scores were observed between the sets of the three intensities. For all 4 analyzed exercises, high-intensity sets elicited higher heart rate, applied force, and perceptual scores compared with the medium- and low-intensity sets. Furthermore, the medium-intensity sets produced higher perceptual, physiologic, and performance responses than the low-intensity sets. Intersession reliability was 0.88 for heart rate, 0.94 and 0.95 for applied force, 0.88 for the RPE-AM, and 0.80 for the RPE-OB. Conclusion: The RISE scale can be considered a valid method for assessing the perceived exertion during resistance exercises performed with elastic bands in the elderly.Key points Older adults can use the RISE scale to verbally rate (easy to maximal) their perceptions of effort during both upper- and lower-body exercises using elastic bands.RISE scale can be used in older adults without reducing the accuracy of the training load dosage prescribed during training/rehabilitation sessions and while carrying out medium- or long-term periodized strength-training programs or therapeutic interventions.Compared with previous scales, RISE is a more sensitive because can discriminate between medium and low intensities of overall body ratings of perceived exertion in the elderly.
机译:该研究的目的是检查新的感知尺度的并发和构建有效性,以控制使用弹性带(耐锻炼的电阻强度规模;上升)的运动强度。二十六名参与者接受了两次由4次练习组成的会议。参与者每次锻炼低,培养基或高强度进行三组15重复。标准变量是心率和施加力(平均值和峰)。在每组的最终重复之后,从升起和用弹性带感受到施加的施加劳动(OMNI-RES EB),收集感知锻炼(RPE)的活性肌(AM)和总体(OB)评级。通过将从尺度,上升和omni-res EB中获得的感知分数相关联建立构建有效性。发现两个尺度之间的显着(p≤0.05)和正线性关系(RPE-AM R〜(2)= 0.90; RPE-OB R〜(2)= 0.77)。在三种强度的组之间观察到心率,施加力和上升评分的显着差异。对于所有4个分析的练习,与中低强度集比相比,高强度集引起了较高的心率,施加力和感知分数。此外,中强组产生比低强度集更高的感知,生理学和性能响应。对于心率,施用力为0.94和0.95,施用力为0.88,RPE-ob为0.88,为RPE-ob为0.88。结论:上升量表可以被认为是评估在老年人的弹性带进行的抵抗锻炼期间评估耐受的有效方法.KEY点老年人可以使用上升规模以口头速率(容易最大)在两者期间的努力的看法使用弹性带的大体锻炼。尺寸可以在老年人中使用,而不降低培训/康复会议期间规定的培训载荷剂量的准确性,同时进行中等或长期级别的强度培训计划或治疗干预措施得到了先前的尺度,上升是一种更敏感的,因为可以区分老年人的施用的总体身体的中等和低强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号